03/10/2008 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

? Mr. Orlowski asked whether the neighbors gave input regarding the plant choices. Ms. Brown noted that the neighbors were unhappy with the rigidity of the line of arborvitae and it has been modified. Mr. Orlowslci questioned sizes of plants at planting and at maturity. Ms. Brown said the plan allows for buffering as well as color and interest. Plants have been proposed at spacing allowing for their maturity. Mr. Rerko said neighborhood input has been taken into account and feels the proposal is well thought out and addresses resident needs. Mr. Schumann stated that they have encouraged input from all of the residents to attend the meeting. In regards to relocating the house, Mr. Schumann said Council will want to consider the relocation as part of the bigger proposal. Mr. O'Malley suggested a more detailed analysis of the proposal. Mr. Schock said that at a committee meeting, Mr. DeLorenzo stated he would make the Bradford home livable once it is moved. Mr. Liggett clarified that they intend to work with the buyer to improve it according to their desire. The garage is required by city code. Mr. Rerko said that relocating the home is an improvement for the property and the empty lot will now be occupied by a home originally from the historic district. This helps maintain the integrity of the street which is most desirable. Ms. Wenger noted that any modifications for the relocated home will need to be presented to the Landmarks Commission for review. Mr. O'Malley stated that the Commission should consider both properties in question for the development to move forward. The lot could be further developed by new home developers if the Bradford home was not moved to the property, so the move further retains the historic value of the street. Aileen Toth, neighboring resident, said that moving the Bradford home will disrupt the continuity of other homes on the street. Her home is most affected by the proposed landscaping and drive. Mr. Rerko said that a new driveway for the Toth property could be constructed from the private driveway, eliminating the conflict. Ed Wiles of 25746 Butternut Ridge asked for clarification of the denial of the demolition permit. Mr. Schumann explained that the developer is in a six month moratorium and the Commission is continuing to work with the developer to preserve the home and positively impact on the development. Mr. Wiles feels that the district should be protected and is concerned with the headlights shining on his home and the lack of buffering. Bob Sharp of 25407 Butternut Ridge asked what was appropriate to discuss in the present meeting. Mr. O'Malley said that the home relocation and development plan revisions are all relevant. Mr. Sharp feels the cluster housing will change the character of the street. The development is not in keeping with the character of the historic district. Ron DeLorenzo, the applicant, said that the new development consists of homes that are deeded, free standing single homes. The homes are being developed as green homes and the architecture reflects the character of the street. He will take input from the Commission and residents and is willing to move the home. He believes the headlights from traffic will hit the cemetery and that no home will be built in proximity to the neighbor's property line. Mr. 0'Malley said there has been conflicting evidence about the condition of the Bradford home. He suggested the applicant provide the Commission with the information for the option on the property and the amount invested and the duration of the option. Mr. O'Malley questioned 2