My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05/28/2008 Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Boards and Commissions
>
2008
>
2008 Planning and Design Commission
>
05/28/2008 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2019 12:47:01 PM
Creation date
1/25/2019 6:00:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
N Olmsted Boards & Commissions
Year
2008
Board Name
Planning & Design Commission
Document Name
Minutes
Date
5/28/2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mr. Joseph Murray was concerned with the meeting notice, where it states "The proposed <br />consolidated parcel will conform to the frontage depth and area requirements of the Zoning <br />Code." At the March 6, 2008 meeting some exceptions to the Zoning Code were mentioned <br />including the frontage and the area of the apron. The letter of May 28 reads that there are no <br />exceptions to the Zoning Code. Ms. Wenger explained the write-up indicates the lot size, area, <br />and width do conform to the code. The variances received are for building setback and apron <br />width, not lot width. They relate to the size of the lot width and frontage of the lot, which do <br />conform. Mr. Lasko added that the square footage and area are in relation to the parcel itself, <br />and does not concern setbacks or where variances or other modifications are required. Mr. <br />Lasko apologized for any inconvenience or confusion. <br />Mr. Lasko moved, seconded by 1VIr. Malone, to approve the consolidation of Permanent <br />Parcel Nuanbers 231-37-024 (0.3114 ac), 231-37-005 (0.1065 ac), 231-37-006 (0.7790 ac), <br />231-37-007 (0.4572 ac) and 231-37-028 (0.2531 ac) into one parcel that will tota11.9072 <br />acres as represented by the plat map dated May 27, 2008, which was unanimously <br />approved, 7-0. <br />NEW BUSINESS <br />COMS08-0006: Haanpton Inn; SW corner of Countrv Club Blvd & Columbia Rd: (V6Vard <br />4) Proposal consists of constructing a new 94-room hotel. Note: Variances may be required. <br />Ms. Wenger provided an overview of the project. The proposal consists of a new hotel to be <br />constructed on the vacant parcel at the southwest corner of Country Club Boulevard and <br />Columbia Road. The parcel is zoned for mixed use. The hotel will be developed on the western <br />portion of the site, with the remainder of the site to remain vacant for possible future <br />development. The building is four stories, with a brick veneer base and EIFS for the remainder. <br />The proposal includes two curb cuts onto Country Club plus a cross access drive to the parcel to <br />the west, which requires an easement and for which documentation is required. The sidewalk <br />will be extended down Country Club, and should also be extended along Columbia Road. <br />In addition to the zoning regulations, this parcel is subject to deed restrictions imposed in the <br />early 90's. The restrictions include office or hotel only - no general or local retail, a maximum <br />height four stories, a 50 foot landscape buffer on Columbia and where abutting any Residential <br />District (including Country Club Blvd.), and no driveway access to Columbia. Storm water will <br />be collected in a dry basin along Country Club. A second dry basin is proposed to handle future <br />development of the site. The sign plan and site plan do not coincide. In regards to the 50-foot <br />landscape setback, Ms. Wenger felt that the eastern driveway could be reconfigured to preserve <br />more green space in the setback area. <br />Mr. Conway said information requested by the Building Department was incomplete. He had <br />questions on the number of rooms and parking spaces, which conflict on the plans. Concerning <br />photometrics, outdoor lighting levels appear fairly low. The parking was altered for the 50' <br />setback yet light fixtures are still shown in that area. A light pole is shown as 27.5' high, which <br />because of its location can only be 20'. Due to conflicting drawings, the exact location of the <br />2
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.