Laserfiche WebLink
pole is not known. No building signs are indicated. Mounted wall packs are shown; they may <br />require a variance. Concerning signage, a sign drawing was submitted, but nothing is called out <br />to explain them. It appears the ground sign is 12.6', which would require a six inch variance. <br />The height for the highway sign is unknown. What axe marked as ground signs are pole signs <br />per the City's definition. Illumination is unknown. Mr. Lasko agreed the plans need worlc; they <br />need to be consolidated and consistent so the Building Department can complete their evaluation. <br />Mr. Collins recommends the westbound aisle along the eastern drive at County Club be removed <br />to avoid traffic congestion. Internal traffic circulation could be improved. Mr. Collins <br />commended the applicant for use of the water quality swale shown on SPO-2, but indicated this <br />could conflict with the landscape plan, as trees seem to be planted in the swales. Curbing is to be <br />ODOT Type 6. To have storm water runoff in the parking lot get to the swales, the openings <br />should be zero-level concrete curbs. ADA compliance for curb ramps is not shown on plans. A <br />hydrant to the rear of the building will probably be necessary. On the far western boundary a <br />possible private watermain is shown, but it is not on the property. Storm water management <br />must follow Chapter 927. A second dry basin is being designed to accommodate future <br />development and future impervious areas, which needs to be confirmed in writing. He <br />recommends the curb cut for the existing drive on Columbia at the southeast corner of site is to <br />be removed. A fire connection and a domestic connection need to be shown on the final plans. <br />Mr. O'Malley said the deed restrictions operate as supplemental code provisions. It is not in the <br />code, but when re-zoning takes place, the deed restriction imposed by the City adds various <br />requirements. The Commission needs to look at the entire lot, which is in play, and be <br />concerned about future development on the balance of the lot. Stortn water retention must be <br />looked at for the entire site. Until it is known what else may be built on the lot, caution is <br />recommended when approving the project as phase one of two phases. The Commission should <br />consider if the remainder of the lot is buildable in accordance with code. Mr. Collins requested <br />and Mr. O'Malley agrees that a tree preservation and removal plan is necessary, which should be <br />done in conjunction with the landscaping plan. Otherwise, the entire lot could be clear cut. <br />Mr. Jeff Kerr represents the engineering firm. Proposed on the two acre site is a 96 room <br />Hampton Inn with 119 parking spaces, and entrance from two access points off Country Club. <br />The parking area is to be asphalt with ODOT Type 6 concrete curbing. Three signs are <br />proposed. Two ground signs are off Country Club; one near the west entrance and one near the <br />intersection at Columbia. A highway sign is to be proposed, as well. It is intended to show <br />ADA compliance on the detail drawings including access ramps, curb cuts, and slopes on <br />handicap spaces on the grading plan. They will work with the Engineer for additional hydrants <br />as necessary. There will be no access from Columbia. The best existing trees are located on <br />western half of the lot, the majority of which will be removed. Growth on east side along <br />Columbia is mostly scrub and is not of significant value and will also probably be removed. <br />Mr. David Mann, architect, clarified the number of rooms and parking spaces provided. The <br />lower level exterior will be masonry brick, the upper floors EIFS material. Hampton Inn's <br />standard earth tone beige and brown colors are proposed with a pool area on the west side. <br />Canopies will be installed at several entrance doors. He reviewed the interior floor plans.