My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05/01/2008 Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Boards and Commissions
>
2008
>
2008 Board of Zoning Appeals
>
05/01/2008 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2019 12:47:06 PM
Creation date
1/25/2019 6:09:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
N Olmsted Boards & Commissions
Year
2008
Board Name
Board of Zoning Appeals
Document Name
Minutes
Date
5/1/2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mr. Conway advised that the last owner was granted a variance for a second wall sign due to the <br />uniqueness of the building front and positioning on Lorain Road. However the electronic sign <br />changing text every 10 to 20 seconds dropping in or sliding out of sight should not be addressed <br />by the Board of Zoning Appeals. He believes that the forum to determine such matters is City <br />Council and if it is new technology which they wish to have considered Council should be <br />addressing the matter. He does not want his inspectors to be required to go to sites with electronic <br />signs and have to time the speed of the changes to ensure it was what was negotiated or time how <br />often the sign change text. The applicant should petition the City Planner and or City Council to <br />address the code. He strongly recommended the board follow the language of the code in the <br />matter of the electronic sign. <br />Mr. Beeman said that what they are asking for is no different then gas stations which run the price <br />of gas or a sign that gives time and temperature it is all content and that is what they axe asking <br />for. He didn't think there was a difference between changing the price of gas more than once a <br />day then what they do. Mr. Conway advised that there was a difference between a price change <br />and changing advertisement and the forum to review the issue was Council. Mr. Beeman said the <br />Small Business Administration states that electronic message centers are not a distraction to <br />drivers. Their readability and composition increases drivers safety and a study was done with <br />cameras prior to and after a billboard was erected and the outcome showed no difference in the <br />traffic flow or safety after the billboard installation. Mr. Fausel said he worked for a company <br />that has been producing electronic signs since the 50's so the technology is not new. Safety is not <br />a concern and there have been extensive study to show that safety is not a factor. In fact if police <br />reports showed electronic signs caused accidents or fatalities they would be out of business. Mr. <br />Gamble said that the sign would be in the peripheral view not on a pole sign 30 feet in the air so <br />there would be no disruption to traffic. He is willing to compromise by discussing how often the <br />messages will be changed and how it will change. Mr. Kaplan said he has watched areas grow <br />and expand to become modernized and witnessed city's which didn't expand with time and those <br />areas have vacant stores along city roads and they are trying to modernize their new site to keep <br />the business growing. He chose the area as he could see that the city is in the process of <br />modernizing itself with newer buildings and codes and they wish to be a part of the growth. His <br />family's company is committed their business to the area and will be involved with local <br />community efforts to help the city evolve. <br />Mrs. Diver read aloud section 1163.23 of the codified to ensure everyone was clear as to what was <br />written: No sign or other advertising structure shall have any lights or illumination that flash, <br />move, rotate, scintillate, blink, flicker, vary in intensity or color, or use intermittent electrical <br />pulses. Ms. Rudolph asked for clarification from the law department. Mr. O'Malley said that the <br />codes, policy and procedures are established by City Council and although the applicants are <br />clearly committed to the city the forum to address the applicant's pleadings is City Council. The <br />Building Commissioner is the enforcer of the code and although the applicants have remedies to <br />appeal the commissioner's decision the testimony given is being presented to the wrong forum. <br />The applicant's appeal is that they are active committed citizens with a great product and therefore <br />the board should find a way to negotiate their system into use. The applicant must show the code <br />creates a practical difficulty which they have failed to do. The applicants arguments are; it will <br />save them money in advertisement, they have an affordable product to offer, they are willing to <br />compromise on how the system is used i.e. changing text face, speed of text change and they are a <br />community minded business none of which shows practical difficulty. <br />6
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.