10/01/2009 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

zoning code would be upheld. Mrs. Bellido did not object. Mrs. Diver did not object as the fence was consistent with fences in the neighborhood, is 50% open and behind shrubs. Ms. Rudolph moved, seconded by Mrs. Bellido, to grant Robert Dehoff of 25171 Doe Drive an 18 inch variance for a black vinyl fence higher than 30" in a side yard setback on a corner lot; code permits 30", applicant shows 48", contingent upon the western chainlink fence being installed in line with the southern neighbor's existing chainlink fence, which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 section 1135.02 f(1) which was unanimously approved 4-0. ' Cindv Mramor; 5716 Allendale Drive: Request for variance (1123.12), which consists of a 4 ft high chainlink fence and the following variance is requested: An 18 inch variance for a ferice higher than 30" in a neighbors 50 ft setback on a corner lot, code permits 30", applicant shows 48", which is in violation of Ord. 90- 125 section 1135.02 f(1). Mr. and Ms. Mramor, Mr. Lanckiewicz contractor and Mr. Nagy a neighbor were sworn in. Mrs. Mramor said they would like a 4 foot high fence to enclose their backyard and would follow the neighbor's fence line to the sidewalk, then continue the fence along the sidewalk to the front corner of their house. They have a dog and also live near the Metroparks where wild animals are located. The chain link is 50% open and no slats would be used to ensure visibility is not. obstructed. The fence would be 18 inches off the sidewalk. Ms. Rudolph asked if the fence could be placed inward in the yard so it doesn't affect the character of the neighborhood which doesn't have fences that close to the sidewalk. Mr. Mramor said they could move it inwaxd but they are concerned that three existing trees would make it difficult to install a uniform line for the fence. Mrs. Sergi asked if the rear fence belonged to the applicants and Mr. Mramor said it belonged to the neighbor and they would be installing their fence up to the neighbor's corner fence but would not connect to it. He also noted that the fence would be installed 44 feet from the neighbor's driveway so it should not obstruct vehicle views. Mr. Nagy said he would not want to see the fence along the sidewalk and suggested that the fence be in line with the corner of his fence to the corner of their house so it wouldn't be intrusive. Mrs. Mramor said at that distance they lose half their backyard which they would like to use. Mrs. Diver asked if the two neighbors had discussed the fence placement and they said they had but did not agree on the distance. Mr. Mramor said having a fence lower than 48 inches exposes their pets and children to animals and people readily obtaining access to their yard. Mr. Mitchell said a chain link fence near the sidewalk was not in character with the neighborhood and could create visual issues, but placing the fence inward 50 feet would be extremely restrictive. The area of concern is along the curved drive/street. Mrs. Mramor asked how far in the board wanted the fence and said they would be willing to come 4 feet in. Mr. Mitchell said 4 foot would not be enough for visibility along the corner. Mr. Lanckiewicz said the fence would be 44 feet from the neighbor's driveway and 50% open. His professional opinion is that it would not obstruct Mr. Nagy's line of sight. Ms. Rudolph said that the turn was an extreme turn and placing a fence 18 inches off the sidewalk would adversely affect the neighborhood block vehicle visibility as they maneuver the corner and should be placed inward 25 feet. Mrs. Bellido felt the fence would be better inside the large trees so it would not be such an impact upon the neighborhood. Mrs. Sergi said the standard width of a backyard is 70 feet 2