Laserfiche WebLink
but there is no intent to make changes other than what Mr. Vivianni has agreed to do. Mr. Rerko <br />questoned the site plan from Herschman Architects and Mr. Lander said the site plan was an old <br />plan provided to him by the realtor so parking could be shown. Mr. Rerko said there was no way <br />to lcnow what parking is currently available on the site as the plan submitted was prior to the road <br />widening. Mrs. Merdith said 1118.03(d) addresses on-site and off-site traffic generation and <br />circulation patterns related to the use shall not adversely impact adjacent uses or result in <br />hazardous conditions for pedestrians or vehicles in or adjacent to the site. Therefore the parking <br />lot is part of the conditional use review. <br />Mr. Cotner felt the violations existed before the road widening and the parking lot is not safe due <br />to the number of pot holes, loose gravel and no identifiable parlcing spaces or traffic direction. <br />Mr. Malone agreed the condition of the parking lot was related to the conditional use review; <br />however prior to the applicant spending money on interior changes they should know whether or <br />not the commission believes the proposed use is acceptable. He would not object to the <br />conditional use if the parking lot issues were resolved. Mr. Rerko agreed. Mr. Lasko said <br />reviewing the conditional use permit standards in 1118.03 the proposed use is the same as the <br />last use which was assembly. Applying the standards the use would meet the conditions of <br />1118.03 other than paragraph (d) which relates to the conditions of the parking lot. Therefore the <br />commission proposes to postpone addressing the request until the court case is resolved as it <br />relates to the condition of the parking lot. If the parking lot was resolved to the satisfaction of <br />the Engineering and Building Departments, the proposed use would be agreeable. All <br />commission members agreed. The applicant asked when the conditional use permit would return <br />and Mr. O'Malley said the commission should base the applicant's return on the owner applying <br />for, obtaining approval and completing the parking lot improvements to the City's satisfaction. <br />Mr. Mitchell requested a photometric plan showing all existing or proposed lighting. <br />Mr. Lasko moved, seconded by 1VIr. Bohlmann, to table CMS09-09 Sovereign Grace <br />Church of 29047 Lorain Road to a later date predicated upon the resolution of the issues <br />pertaining to the parking lot as they relate to the conditional use permit which was <br />unanimously approved 7-0. <br />COMMUNICATIONS <br />Ms. Wenger invited everyone to attend the City's 100' birthday celebration on Friday, August <br />28, 2009 at 7:00 pm at North Olmsted Park as part of the homecoming festival. <br />ADJOURNMENT <br />With no further business the meeting was adjourned at 9:10 pm. <br />/033 <br />?ak <br />J J. Las , Jr., Chair onna Rote, Clerk of Commissions <br />?'.?Z/D <br />Approved <br />4