06/10/2009 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

tower with only one carrier attached is structurally strong enough to accommodate a WECS. Ms. Meredith asked if the mall designed their light poles to handle WECS would they be allowed more than one in their parking lot as the chapter states there can not be more than one per lot. Ms. Wenger said, without a variance each lot would only be allowed one WECS. Section 1153.03 Development Standards for Small and Medium WECS: Mr. Lasko questioned noise levels permitted in the codified ordinances compared to the maximum levels listed in the new chapter. Mr. Mitchell said the proposed decibel readings are compatible with Chapter 555.04. It states from 8:00 am to 9:00 pm in residential two family multi family district maximum decibel readings of 60 dB(A). In a residential public space open areas 8:00 pm to 9:00 am 50 dB(A) with all readings being measured at the lot line. Mr. Rerko said a residential HVAC condensing unit sound level is 60 dB(A) to 65 dB(A), dishwasher or refrigerators are 35 dB(A) to 40 dB(A) and highways are 100 dB(A) or more. Ms. Wenger said as wind increases the noise level of the WECS increases, as would ambient noise levels. Mr. Lasko questioned ambient noise levels and Mr. Rerko said ambient levels on a street are about 70 dB(A). Section 1153.04 Additional Regulations for Small WECS: Mr. Lasko said in addition to the WECS being a conditional use and having minimum land requirements of 1 acre, the setback requirements also control the potential height of a wind turbine. Section 1153.05 Additional Regulations for Medium WECS: Mr. Lasko repeated that in addition to the WECS being a conditional use and having minimum land requirements of 5 acres, a 150 foot high turbine's required setback from a residential property line would be 225 feet. If this ordinance is adopted, by virtue of the conditional use requirement no WECS small or medium is automatically assured the right to be installed on either a 1 or 5 acre lot. An applicant must meet all conditions the commission may require as well as any additional conditions city council believes to be necessary before a conditional use permit is granted. Mr. O'Malley said Chapter 1118 regulated the conditional use review and noted that a permitted use would not be subject to such a review. Ms. Meredith said Chapter 1118 was recently updated and gives the city the resources to revoke the permit if the conditions are not met or maintained. Section 1153.06 Building Integrated WECS: Mr. Malone questioned if solar power would be addressed similarly to wind, and if they would be permitted on buildings in all districts. Ms. Wenger said there is no zoning regulation of solar panels other than building code requirements. However wind because of its nature, particularly its greater potential impact on surrounding property, requires additional scrutiny thereby requiring the zoning code regulations. It is clear that technology can and is constantly changing in form and design. The code is a good starting point and if a good design is presented for mounting a system on a roof which does not meet the zoning requirements but makes sense and is structurally sound, a variance can be sought. Mr. Rerko said an issue to look at is sound or vibration transmission when WECS axe mounted on a building or structural column, as any noise or frequencies created will vibrate throughout the entire building and be felt through the structural system. Such noise or frequencies are created by a system which is not properly maintained. He suggested requiring WECS to have a separate mounting system when attaching building integrated systems as well as requiring periodic maintenance inspections.