Laserfiche WebLink
address it at a later date. They would like to have the development plan approved so they can <br />proceed and if changes are required they would be made and new plan submitted. To address <br />outdoor storage they will eliminate it so the development can move forward and will submit it <br />later through the permit process. They have time constraints from the owners which must be met <br />which include receiving approvals. They will address all engineering issues to ensure they meet <br />code. Mr. Rerko said the canopy lacks detail. He understands there will be propane and ice sold <br />outdoors but does not believe there is a need for the vending machines at the site. He aslced if <br />there would be trash cans at the pumps and around the building and Mr. Bishop said there would <br />be at both areas and noted that the kiosk would only sell snacks and soda. Mr. Rerko did not feel <br />vending machines were warranted with the kiosk selling items and the store so close. Mr. <br />Malone said he would like to have the following plant sizes: dwarf burning bush at 30" to 36", <br />Bradmore Juniper at 5 gallon, Honey Locust at 2%2" caliper and Spring Snow Crab Apple at 21/2 <br />caliper. He asked if the landscaping throughout the site would be irrigated as it is not noted and <br />advised that it is required by code. Mr. Bishop said they would provide irrigation. Board <br />inemUers disliked having vending machines outdoors and said if vending machines would be <br />located at the site they should be enclosed and not visible from the street. Mr. O'Malley said that <br />if the applicants return with outdoor,sales, the commission could address the manner in which <br />they could be at the site now. Ms. Wenger said if vending machines are at the site they could be <br />located in a shielded area along the north side of the kiosk to minimize visibility. <br />Mr. Majeed said they would address outdoor storage as a minor change at a later date. Mr. <br />Bohlmann felt any outdoor items should be behind a screened wall. Mr. Parry did not feel the <br />outdoor sales should be addressed later as a standard sidewallc width would not meet code if <br />outdoor machines are installed nor could it be a minor change because the sidewallcs would be <br />required to be increased in size which could not be done after the design is approved. The <br />applicants should state if the sidewallcs will be designed to handle the machines and meet code, <br />eliininate any outdoor sales or the case should be tabled until the outdoor sale items are resolved. <br />Mr. Parry asked if detailed elevations were submitted for the kiosk and canopy. He asked what <br />materials and colors would be used as they were not listed nor were samples provided. Mr. <br />Majeed said the canopy would be metal, the colors would be as shown and the kiosk briclc. The <br />canopy will have no logos or inlaid graphics. Mr. Parry aslced if lighting cut sheets were <br />suUmitted and if the lights would be full cutoffs. Mr. Majeed said the lighting would be standard <br />down lights but could not say for sure what type of light it would be. A discussion pertaining to <br />tabling the matter ensued and the applicants were advised that final approval by Council would <br />not be delayed by returning for further review. Applicants should return with detailed plans <br />inchiding landscaping, detailed elevations including diinensions, signage, light cut sheets, <br />photoinetric which meets code, details of any outdoor storage, a materials list and color samples. <br />Mr. Bishop aslced if the Commission was against the plan to have a GetGo station and they <br />assured the applicant they loolced forward to having the GetGo in North Olmsted. <br />Mrs.lVIeredith moved, seconded by 1VIr.1VIalone, to table CMS10-33: GetGo IFuel Station of <br />27264 Lorain Road, which was approved 6-0. <br />COMIVIUNICATION <br />Ms. Wenger said that Landmarks Commission was Ueginning the process of having a Porter <br />3