Laserfiche WebLink
load, structural computations, dimensions, screening and details of sled. Mr. O'Malley said in <br />accordance to Chapter 1151.04(C)(2) the additional antenna is a conditional accessory use and <br />noted that there are federal laws which govern such antennas as well. <br />Mr. Sindyla said that the plans which were first submitted represent site conditions once worlc is <br />complete and if approved he will submit full detailed construction plans to the building <br />departinent which will meet all the requests. The site is a standard site for the installation of the <br />antennas. The antenna array along the western corner of the rooftop matches the existing array <br />which was approved Uy the city so they matched what was already approved. Although there <br />was no requirement to remove any antennas from the rooftop they have worked out an agreement <br />with the landlord to remove 8 antennas from the penthouse which are non-fiinctioning and or in <br />disrepair. Screening was not provided as the existing Verizon layout was not and they do not <br />feel it will have a visual impact at ground level. <br />Mr. Rerlco said neither a sight line study nor detailed installation plans were submitted and the <br />roof top is polluted with antennas so the fact that 8 antennas will be removed helps him loolc <br />more favorably on the project. He aslced if there would be microwaves with the installation. Mr. <br />Sindyla said there were inicrowaves on each sector of their antennas. Mr. Rerlco said <br />microwaves heat up anything within its sight line which everyone should be aware of. <br />Repainnen who are in front of the antennas for long periods of tiine are affected by the <br />microwaves although to what extent is not lcnown, therefore there should be warning signs <br />posted on the rooftop. Mr. Sindyla suggested that the leasing agent is very aware of the antennas <br />einissions but they will post signs if required. Mr. Rerlco said at minimum there should be a <br />warning sign on the access door to the roof so anyone accessing the rooftop is made aware of the <br />rislcs. Screening material would just malce the site appear to be more cluttered. The proposed <br />sled is added and concrete bloclc is placed on it for the antenna and the blocks will not be seen. <br />Mr. Sindyla said they would only be installing one sled and antenna on the roof. There will be <br />two antennas and two dishes on the penthouse and the one sled with the antenna along the west <br />coilier. Mr. Laslco said the removal of the 8 antennas mitigates the concerns brought up however <br />a wai7ling sign should be on the door for the salce of safety. Mr. Cotner aslced the height above <br />the roof of the antennas and Mr. Sindyla said the dishes on the roof top are 17 feet above the <br />roo£ A brief discussion ensued pertaining to the number of antennas being removed and <br />possible safety issues with the sled and it was noted that there are safety wires which must be <br />used if you are on the roof or penthouse. <br />Mr. Lasko moved, seconded by Mre Malone, to approve the proposal for CMS10-13: <br />Clearwire of 25151 Brookpark laoad to collocate on an existing building conditioned upon <br />detailed plans being submitted which meets all the Building Commissioner's requirements <br />prioi• to building permits being issued and a warning sign being installed on the access <br />points to the i•oofs addressing all microwave fa-equency hazards which was approved 4-0. <br />CMS10-14: Welcome House; 27200 Lorain Road: <br />Proposal consists of a conditional use peimit. At the request of the applicant the proposal was <br />tabled to the following meeting. <br />2