Laserfiche WebLink
BOARD OF BUILDING CODE APPEALS <br />CITY OF NORTH OLMSTED <br />MINUTES FOR MAY 19, 2011 <br />ROLL CALL <br />Chair Sabo called the meeting to order at 5:30 p.m. in Council Chambers.. <br />Present: Donna Sabo, Julianne Nader, BJ Meder, Dan Jarachovic <br />Staff: Building Commissioner Dale Mitchell, Clerk of Commissions Donna Rote <br />Mr. Meder moved, seconded by Mr. Jarachovic, to appoint Donna Sabo chair for 2011 <br />which passed 3-0; Ms. Sabo abstained. <br />Ms. Sabo moved, seconded by Mr. Jarachovic, to appoint BJ Meder vice chair for 2011 <br />which passed 3-0; Mr. Meder abstained. <br />REVIEW AND CORRECTION OF MINUTES <br />Mr. Jarachovic moved, seconded by Ms. Nader, to approve the Board of Building Code <br />Appeals minutes of March 17, 2011 which passed 3-0; Mr. Meder abstained. <br />Mr. Meder moved, seconded by Ms. Nader, to approve the Board of Building Code <br />Appeals minutes of Apri121, 2011 minutes which passed 4-0. <br />OLD BUSINESS <br />Mark Weston; 4403 West Ranchview <br />Proposal consists of installing fencing where a fence is already installed. <br />The following variance is requested: a variance to install an 85 foot section of fence along rear <br />property line where a fence already exists, section 1369.03(a)(3). <br />After being sworn in Mr. Weston said he was not aware his attendance was required and <br />apologized for being absent in April. He would like to have a fence to contain his dogs in his <br />yard. There is a CEI easement along the back of the property which prohibits the fence being <br />placed along the property line. He does not own the existing rear fence which expands over two <br />neighboring properties. One of the neighbors has allowed his section of split-rail fence to be <br />removed however the other neighbor wishes to keep his fence. He has talked to his side <br />neighbors who stated they have no objections to the chain link fence. Mr. Mitchell said he visited <br />the site and one neighbor allowed his fence to be removed and the other fixed his fence to keep. <br />He has no objections to the variance as there is a gate to maintain the easement area. Board <br />members had no objections due to the existing CEI easement and a gate being added for access. <br />Mr. Meder moved, seconded by Mr. Jarachovic, to grant Mark Weston of 4403 West <br />Ranchview a variance to install an 85 foot section of fence along rear property line where a <br />fence already exists which includes a 4 foot gate for access to maintain easement area, <br />section 1369.03(a)(3) which passed 4-0.