My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12/01/2011 Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Boards and Commissions
>
2011
>
2011 Board of Zoning Appeals
>
12/01/2011 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2019 12:47:33 PM
Creation date
1/25/2019 7:34:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
N Olmsted Boards & Commissions
Year
2011
Board Name
Board of Zoning Appeals
Document Name
Minutes
Date
12/1/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS <br />CITY OF NORTH OLMSTED <br />MINUTES OF DECEMBER 1, 2011 <br />ROLL CALL <br />Ms. Sergi called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. in Council Chambers. <br />Present: Nancy Sergi, Maureen Diver, Laura Bellido, Jennifer Rudolph, Alfredo Lopez <br />Staff: Law Director Michael Gareau Jr., Building Commissioner Dale Mitchell, Clerlc of <br />Commissions Donna Rote <br />REVIEW ANI2 CORRECTION OF MINUTES <br />Ms. Rudolph moved, seconded by Ms. Bellido, to approve the amended minutes of <br />November 3, 2011 which passed 5-0. <br />RESIDENTIAL APPEALS AND REQUESTS <br />Kerry & Star McFarland; 31407 Bradley Road <br />Proposal consists of an addition to existing home and the following variance is requested: <br />A variance for expanding a non-conforming use; code allows continuation of a non-conforming <br />use so long as the use is not extended or expanded onio other parts of the lot, applicant shows a <br />home addition, Section 1165.04(a). Note: Current use is single family residence which is not <br />permitted in a Limited Industry District. <br />Mr. McFarland and Mr. Margulies, the architect, were sworn in. Mr. McFarland said he'd <br />owned the family home since 2000. His sister and her son lived in the home until July 2011. <br />The existing house is a two bedroom, single bath, 916 square foot home. Due to the current <br />economy he would like to remodel the home to accommodate his business and family. Mr. <br />Margulies said the addition is across the back of the existing home so the front elevation would <br />have minimal changes. <br />Mr. Mitchell said due to the limited industry zoning, adding to the home is prohibited. He did <br />not believe that the home should be expanded. Mr. McFarland said his business has been broken <br />into and there is no onsite use as the home is too small to use as a home or office. The <br />surrounding area is residential homes which are used both as a residence and business so what he <br />proposes would fit the character of the neighborhood. Ms. Rudolph asked if the rear fence would <br />remain and if he and his wife would reside within the home and Mr. McFarland said yes, he <br />would like to live and run his business from the home. Ms. Rudolph said in visiting the site the <br />area clearly appears residential and asked when the area was rezoned to limited industry. It <br />appears that the city took a populated residential area, rezoned it in the hopes that it would <br />redevelop into limited industry which hasn't occurred. Mr. Gareau believed that the rezoning <br />took place before 1996. The house clearly predates the code and it is a question of allowing the <br />non-conforming use to be expanded or not. Ms. Rudolph said when the site was rezoned the <br />residents didn't have a say. Ms. Diver questioned zoning of the surrounding area. Mr. <br />Margulies said that the area across the street was rezoned residential/office which is why the area
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.