Laserfiche WebLink
that such a use is acceptable at the owner's rental property but not at their own residence clearly <br />shows they understand the adverse impact such a vehicle has on a residential neighborhood. <br />Mr. Lopez moved, seconded by Ms. Diver, to grant Ga-egory Cuiffo of 5310 Dover Center <br />Road the following variances: <br />1. A home occupation variance; parking overnight in driveways; code does not permit, <br />applicant shows 23 ft. long truck, Section 1135.02(b)(6). <br />2. A home occupation variance; requires the residential character of the dwelling exterior <br />shall not be changecl; cocle does not permit, applicant shows truck in driveway, Seetion <br />1135.02(b)(5). <br />3. A home occupation variance for not residing within the dwelling; code requires <br />members of the family, applicant uses as rental property, Section 1135.02(b)(1). <br />Motaon failed 0-5. <br />COMMERCIAL APPEALS AND REQUESTS <br />Jared Jewelers; 25851 Brookpark IZoad <br />The proposal consists of a wall sign. The following variances are requested: <br />1. A 9" variance for a wall sign higher than code allows; code permits 4' 0", applicant shows <br />4'9", Section 1163.28(c). <br />2. A variance for a third wall sign on a building; code permits 1, applicant shows 3, Section <br />1163.28(a). (BZA granted a variance for 1 additional wall sign 5/5/2003). <br />3. A 164.2 sq. ft. variance for additional sq. ft. of signage on a building; code permits 103 sq. <br />ft., applicant shows 267.2 sq. ft., Section 1163.25(b). (BZA granted a variance for 75.1 sq. <br />ft. of additional signage on a building. 5/5/2003). <br />Mr. Beeman of Wagner Electric Signs was sworn in. A letter from the owner was read <br />authorizing Mr. Beeinan to represent them. Mr. Beeman said his client would like to install a <br />sign on the east elevation of the building. The third sign would not affect government services <br />and will match the existing signs both in size and material. It would give them visibility to <br />traffic entering the Brookpark Road entrance. Mr. Mitchell said the applicant was previously <br />granted variances for signage and he does not believe the request is warranted. Ms. Rudolph <br />asked if their customers complained about finding the store and Mr. Beeman said he had not <br />spoken to the client so is unaware of any complaints. The sign identifies the location and being <br />identified is the key to any business. Ms. Diver suggested relocating existing signs. Ms. <br />Rudolph said the applicant has not provided evidence that a third wall sign is warranted. There <br />is also undeveloped space to the east which if developed would block the east elevation. Ms. <br />Bellido said when driving to the site the two existing signs are very visible. Ms. Sergi said the <br />diamond logos were on all four elevations of the building which provides recognition. <br />Ms. Rudolph moved, seconded by Mr. I,opez, to grant Jared Jewelers of 25851 Broolcpark <br />Road the following variances: <br />1. A 9" variance for a wall sign higher than code allows; code permits 490", applicant <br />shows 4'9", Section 1163.28(c). <br />2. A variance for a third wall sign on a building; code permits 1, applicant shows 3, <br />Section 1163.28(a). <br />4