My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12/01/2011 Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Boards and Commissions
>
2011
>
2011 Board of Zoning Appeals
>
12/01/2011 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2019 12:47:33 PM
Creation date
1/25/2019 7:34:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
N Olmsted Boards & Commissions
Year
2011
Board Name
Board of Zoning Appeals
Document Name
Minutes
Date
12/1/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
3. A 164.2 sq. ft. variance for additional sq. ft. of signage on a building; code permits 103 <br />sq. ft., applicant shows 267.2 sq. ft., Section 1163.25(b). <br />Motion failed 0-5. <br />CMS11-23: Lucky Break Cafe; 26715 Brookpark Road Ext <br />The proposal consists of an internet cafe. The following variances are requested: <br />1. A 263.5 foot variance for insufficient spacing. Code requires a minimum distance of 500 <br />feet measured from the closest point of the building and parking lot of the business to the <br />property line of any residentially zoned property, place of worship, public or private school, <br />park, playground, library, or public building. Applicant shows lot 236.5 feet from <br />residentially zoned property, Section 1139.01(d)(4)(A). See exhibit. <br />2. A variance for insufficient floor area. Code requires a minimum area of fifty (50) square feet <br />per entertainment device in each room in which entertainment devices are located. Applicant <br />shows less than 50 square feet per device, Section 1139.01(d)(4)(B). Note: rear hall and area <br />outside restrooms are not considered part of the room. <br />3. A variance for insufficient parking. Code requires a minimum of one (1) parking space per <br />every terminal, plus one (1) space per every full time employee. Applicant shows less, see <br />table, Section 1139.01(d)(4)(D). <br /> Square Footage Large unit Large unit Existing <br /> development development parlcing <br /> 1161.05(w) min: 1161.05(w) max: spaces <br /> 5 er 1,000 sf 6 er 1,000 sf <br />Cherandon No. 2 16,142 sf (plaza) 65 78 52 <br />Luclcy Break Cafe 1,600 sf (cafe) 21 21 (-34) <br /> 86 99 <br />* 80% of total floor area used to calculate parking requirement. <br />Mr. Kanis and Mr. DiBenedetto were sworn in. Mr. Kanis said they are requesting three <br />variances for their business. They first applied for their permits and licenses August of 2010 and <br />they were not made aware of being out of code until after all the work was completed and <br />inspections passed. It wasn't until they were about to receive their occupancy permit that they <br />were told they needed to go before the boards and commissions. Code requires 50 sq ft of space <br />per unit and they have been able to provide about 48 sq ft per unit. They are required to have 21 <br />parking spaces and the lot has 52 parking spaces which are shared. There is also a variance <br />required for being outside the zoning. The 253 foot distance to a residential lot is residential area <br />which is wooded undeveloped property. Mr. DiBenedetto said his tenants have spent thousand <br />of dollars to develop the suite and pulled the proper permits for all the work they did. He stated <br />that his family has cross easements for parking throughout the plaza. <br />Mr. Mitchell said the site needs a variance of 263.5 ft for distance from a residential lot. He <br />noted that the residential area was undeveloped green space. The applicants need a total of 1,000 <br />sq ft for the 20 units and have 991 sq ft of space which doesn't meet the 50 sq ft per device <br />requirement. Parking for the tenant building has 52 existing spaces and 86 spaces are required <br />therefore a variance for 34 parking spaces is required. Ms. Sergi asked if the building regardless <br />if the applicant is in the space or not was short on parking and Mr. Mitchell said yes. Ms. Sergi <br />asked the building departments stand on the request. Mr. Mitchell said the parcel/lot parking <br />was alread.y non-conforming and the proposed tenant increases the non-conformance an
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.