My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01/26/2011 Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Boards and Commissions
>
2011
>
2011 Planning and Design Commission
>
01/26/2011 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2019 12:47:41 PM
Creation date
1/25/2019 8:01:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
N Olmsted Boards & Commissions
Year
2011
Board Name
Planning & Design Commission
Document Name
Minutes
Date
1/26/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
-- ,. <br />PLANNING & DESIGN COlVIMISSION <br />CITY OF NORTH OLMSTED <br />MEETING MINiJTES OF JANUAlYY 26, 2011 <br />ROLL CAL,L <br />Mrs. Meredith called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. in Council Chambers and led the Pledge <br />of Allegiance. <br />Present: Melissa Meredith, Greg Malone, Ralph Bohlmann, Don Rerlco <br />Absent: Robert Parry, Jim Cotner <br />Staff: Planning and Development Director Kimberly Wenger, Assistant Law Director Bryan <br />O'Malley, City Engineer Pietro DiFranco, Clerlc of Commissions Donna Rote <br />REVIEW AND CORRECTION OF MINUTES <br />1dIrs.10'Ieredith moved, seconded by Mr.1VIalone, to approve the Planning and Design <br />Commission minutes of January 12, 2011 which was approved 4-0. <br />NEW BUSINESS <br />CMS10-35: Gyro George; 30791 Lorain Road <br />Representative: George Glyptis, owner <br />Ms. Wenger said the proj ect consists of building modifications which were made without <br />permits or prior approval. The applicant painted the brick building white and the roof shingles <br />blue in 2009, after the applicant was cited by the building department, an application for a <br />minor change was submitted and denied December 2009. The owner was advised to return the <br />building to its original state or seek approval from the Commission. In October 2010 the <br />applicant submitted an application, and a property maintenance inspection was conducted which <br />revealed a number of ongoing property maintenance issues. She is concerned with the current <br />condition of the site and continual occurrence of property maintenance issues. Mr. Mitchell <br />noted a number of property maintenance concerns including, a neon sign in the window, <br />dilapidated fencing, damaged dumpster enclosure, unlcempt landscaping and the dumpster being <br />housed outside the enclosure. Mr. O'Malley reviewed the difference between property <br />maintenance issues, the minor change process and deviations from approved plans. He advised <br />the commission the entire site was before them for review. <br />Mr. Glyptis said he was not aware a permit was required to paint his building or he would have <br />applied for a permit first. The building had graffiti across the back which needed to be <br />addressed. The colors chosen match the other four locations which are the Greek colors white <br />and blue. The white and blue colors are corporate colors, which he would like to retain. Mrs. <br />Meredith voiced her concern that it took the owner a year to apply to address the violations. <br />Mr. Rerlco said the original loolc of the building was better than the state it currently is in. Due <br />to the brick being painted it would be very difficult to go back to the natural brick. Therefore <br />the shingles should be replaced as the painted shingles which were already in poor condition
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.