My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01/26/2011 Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Boards and Commissions
>
2011
>
2011 Planning and Design Commission
>
01/26/2011 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2019 12:47:41 PM
Creation date
1/25/2019 8:01:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
N Olmsted Boards & Commissions
Year
2011
Board Name
Planning & Design Commission
Document Name
Minutes
Date
1/26/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />will deteriorate quicker then it would typically. There are blue slate shingles which are <br />available that would not be as bright and would tone the building down. The building also <br />needs to be repainted. The current paint condition is very splotchy and various areas are <br />bleeding through. Installing canopies over the window and entrance door will help the building <br />blend with the residential surroundings. The conditions of the fence and dumpster enclosure <br />area are such they should be replaced and the neon sign removed from the window. Mr. <br />Malone agreed with Mr. Rerko and said the landscaping appearance throughout the site was <br />inadequate for a commercial site. There is no buffering along the residential property line and <br />there is no entranceway landscaping. Existing landscaping is in very poor condition including <br />retaining walls. The landscaping needs to be completely renovated. Mr. Bohlmann felt the <br />colors did not blend into the residential neighborhood and suggested darker colors due to the <br />proximity to residential homes. Mr. Glyptis said the Commission's comments sound <br />discriminatory. The building and fence was full of graffiti and painting the building improved <br />the site and it now matches all other restaurants he owns. Mr. Bohlmann assured the applicant <br />any site in such poor condition would be addressed in the same manner. The fence is <br />dilapidated and should be replaced with a board on board or vinyl fencing including the <br />dumpster enclosure. There are a number of issues on the site which needs to be addressed <br />including whether or not a sidewalk is required. Mr. O'Malley said that issue would need to be <br />researched. Mr. Bohlmann said the painted brick does not match those of the neighboring sites <br />which are brick and asked if the paint could be removed. Mr. Rerlco said if the building was <br />sandblasted to remove the paint the briclc would be damaged. A discussion ensued regarding <br />other products then sandblasting to remove the paint which would only have minimal damage. <br />There are also products to use over brick to graffiti proof them. <br />Mrs. Meredith noted that the Warrensville building shown in the photo had brick which wasn't <br />painted. The commission has been placed in an awkward position by the applicant due to the <br />fact that the work was completed without permits or prior approval. The recommendations of <br />the commission are to replace the roof shingles with a blue slate, repaint the building, add black <br />fabric awnings over the window and door, place shutters on either side of the window, a new <br />enhanced landscaping plan for the site, replace the existing fence and dumpster enclosure and <br />maintain the dumpster within the enclosure. Mr. Bohlmann said fencing and landscaping <br />should be placed along the border of the residential property. Mr. Glyptis said he was <br />overwhelmed as he thought he was present only to address the color of the building and it's <br />turned into negotiations which he is not prepared for. He said he was not sure if he needed legal <br />assistance or not and Mr. O'Malley said the applicant was welcome to postpone further <br />discussions and return with legal counsel. Mr. Glyptis said he was not prepared to discuss <br />fencing, landscaping, dumpster enclosure and other things brought up as his budget is limited. <br />Mrs. Meredith explained the Commission's role of taking what has been done and try to <br />minimize the adverse impact created upon the neighborhood. Mr. Bohlmann asked the building <br />official to research if a sidewalk is required. Ms. Wenger said the condition of the fence was <br />such that it should be entirely replaced with either a board on board or vinyl style fence. Mr. <br />O'Malley said addressing property maintenance issues was not something which could be <br />negotiated they must be rectified. Mrs. Meredith asked how the applicant would like to <br />proceed. Mr. Glyptis said he would like to be tabled so he could look into the suggestions <br />made. <br />2
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.