My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06/09/1998 Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Boards and Commissions
>
1998
>
1998 Planning Commission
>
06/09/1998 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2019 12:47:46 PM
Creation date
1/28/2019 3:13:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
N Olmsted Boards & Commissions
Year
1998
Board Name
Planning Commission
Document Name
Minutes
Date
6/9/1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
? <br /> <br />types of developments for the owners of these buildings to apply for certain types of set asides <br />and rent subsidies, however his development team has chosen not to pursue that avenue. He <br />noted the project may involve some type of federal insurance on the mortgage, however, that will <br />have no bearing on the operations and rent charged in this facility. Mr. McGettrick noted the site <br />plan includes a landscaped driveway and parking will be close to the entrance with a drop off <br />canopy. The floor plan identified on the plan dated May 27, 1998 included a diuing room, large <br />living room, and a commercial kitchen on the first floor in addition to the units. On the second <br />floor an activity room is planned which Mr. McGettrick explained would mainly be used for arts, <br />crafts, and different planned activities. Floor three will have a community room wluch he <br />explained would be used for choir and theater performances. In addition there was a soda <br />shop/gift shop on the first floor and a barber/beauty shop on the second floor. The materials, Mr. <br />McGettrick advised would be residential in class and design which include: glass tile forming the <br />base; sandstone type water table; a masonry unit; a fabric siding; and there will be a medal roof <br />above the hubble or node area but the remainder of the facility will have a shingled roof. Mr. <br />Tallon requested that the architect elaborate on the masonry unit type. Mr. McGettrick <br />coufiiYned the masonry unit would be an eight by eight brick. Mr. Spalding noted there is not an <br />exercise or therapy room available and wondered how people with those types of needs would be <br />accominodated. W. McGettrick covfuYned there are common ar.ea spaces, such as the activity <br />room on the secoud floor which it is anticipated would be utilized for physical activities such as <br />group therapy as well as arts/craft type activities. W. O'Neil elaborated, for residents that are in <br />need of routine physical therapy there will be a massage therapist once a week to offer that type <br />of service, but tlus facility is not meant to be a rehabilitation center. In response to a question <br />from Mrs. O'Rourke, Mr. O'Neil verified some people may stay in this facility for au interun <br />period while recovering from an injury. Mr. Brennan noted the Bradley Road facility is able to <br />coexist with the residential area very well as it is one floor and appears residential in nature. He <br />noted, because there are residents on either side of this proposed development the building looks <br />overpowering. Mr. O'Neil noted reducing it to one story would mean the first floor would have <br />to be expanded. He did not believe this would be in the best interest of the people that will use <br />the facility, as the walking distances would be tremendous. Mr. Tallon questioned the height of <br />the atrium and Mr. McGettrick coufinned it would not exceed the 45 feet wluch is permitted by <br />the code. Mr. Conway noted according to the scale the height is approximately 50 feet which <br />would exceed the code. Mr. Tallon recommended bringing this down so that it is on the roof <br />line. Mr. McGettrick explained the atrium is very close to being in alignment with the roof line, <br />but he believed the pitched roof with the proportions proposed were in keeping with the <br />remainder of the facility. In response to a question from Mr. Tallon, Building Commissioner <br />Conway advised the roof is approximately 38 feet high. Mr. Tallon noted he would like to see <br />the building muted more into the residential area rather than having big statements. Mr. <br />McGettrick was willing to propose a compromise to address the relationship of this proposed <br />development to the residential area, but requested that the commission take into consideration <br />that 60% ofthe building fronts on Brookpark Road. Mr. Tallon noted the landscaping could also <br />be upgraded to accommodate the surrounding residents. In response to a question from Mrs. <br />O'Rourke, Mr. Conway verified parking does comply to the code as they have provided ten <br />parking spaces for help along with the one per suite. He noted some of the parking is landbanked <br />and a few parking spaces are on the residentially zoned land which is permitted with a conditional <br />use permit. Mr. Brennan advised there is an island in the center of the driveway leading to <br />Clague Road and there should not be a sign placed in that location because there are residents on <br />either side of the driveway. In addition, he explained all pole lights should be residential in <br />nature. Mr. McGettrick agreed to comply with Mr. Brennan's recommendations. Mr. Crawl, <br />4
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.