05/26/1998 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

I? i r J dumpster on the building has been moved once again and requested that it be rotated 180 degrees. Additionally-Mr. Tallon stated he was pleased with the fact the back side of the property (ditch) will be culverted. Mr. Wagner explained, although they still have to negotiate it with the existing tenant, they are opting to vacate the space in its entirety to. minimi?e the renovation time which will hopefully be about three months. He explained that business will either be temporarily shut down or relocated. Mr. Spalding questioned the height ofthe new board on board fence, and was advised it would be a 6 foot fence per the request of the' planning commission. Ms. Bowman questioned what portion of the building will be demolished. Mr. Wagner went over the site plan with Ms. Bowman. He confirmed the residents on the western side of the property would not face any rubbish cans. Mr. Spalding wondered if the developer would consider placing "Dangerous Intersection" warnings at the Clague Road Exit and he questioned if the traffic situation on the site has been reviewed by the proper city department. Mr. Wagner explained the City Traffic Engineer reviewed the plan last year and 'm summary he agreed it is inaportant to maintain four access points. There were no fiuther questions. ? R. Tallon motioned to approve the proposal of Retail Today (Former Krogars Supermarket) located on the East side of..Clague Road, South adjacent to proposed CVS Pharmacy, 'a proposal to Renovate & Reduce the existmg structure and refer the proposal to architectural review board with the recommendation that the dumpster be moved to the front of the build.ing and rotated 180 degrees so that the gates face the back of the properiy. The motion was seconded by T. Brennan and unanimously approved. The clerk announced architectural review board will meet at 5:30 P.M. on June 17, 1998 and notification is not required for that meeting. Mr. Tallon began a motion on a recommendation to the board of zoning appeals and was advised by Bu.ilding Commissioner Conway this would not be referred to board of zoning appeals as the building is existing. Mr. Tallon announced if the developer complies with the recommendations of architectural review board, this will not have to return to plauning commission and can be sent to city council for final approval. N. NEW DEVELOPMENTS AND SUBDIVISIONS: A) Underwood Lot Split and Assembly Plat No. 2 The proposal is to split off the north portion of land designated as Permanent Parcel Numbers 237-21-08 and 237-21-13 and 237-23-01, each of which fronts on the north side of Mastick Road, and join these split off portions to adjacent land designated as permanent parcel numbers 237-21-01 and 237-23-33, with frontage on both Brookpark and Clague Roads (southwest area). Also mcluded is the combining of the south remnant of parce1237-23-01 with parce1237-23-02, both of which have the same ownership and front on Mastick Road. Zoning is Multiple Residence (north, Brookpark frontage) and A Residence, Single (south, Mastick frontage), with the lot splits, coincid.ing with the district zone line. (Frontage of one proposed sublot, 3-Z, does not conform to zoning code requ.irements for an A district, but is less non-conforming than previously). Mr. Bower simmarized the proposal is to take three parcels that front on Mastick Road (i.e. parcel numbers 237-21-08, 237-21-13, and 237-23-01) split them at the zoned line and join the northern portion (zoned Multi Family) to the parcel designated as "Z" on the plat. The members reviewed the submission and invited any interested parties from the audience to review the plat posted on the bulletin board. The following residents expressed concerns: Mr. Troibner and Ms. Casedonte. These concerns included: the maintenance of the land; the impact such a consolidation would have on the area; what it will change in terms of zoning; if the land would be developed; and what impact a development would have on the area in terms of increased traffic. Mr. Tallon explained at this time the land is zoned multi family and that is what can be built on the properry. He added in the future any property owner could apply for a zoning change. Per a request from one of the residents, Mr. Bower agreed to make sure the grass gets cut. Mr. Tallon 5