10/21/1998 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

plan be developed and submitted to the City showing the reuse of the existing shrubbery. This is not to hold up the proposal, but there should be a record of what will be done. Mr. Yager indicated he liked the proposal but is concerned about the landscaping. Mr. Ryba indicated there will be a five foot area between the building and the sidewalk for landscaping. There will be an assessment of what is there and what will be done to provide a more detailed plan. Mr. Zergott asked what would be done with the columnar trees that are there now. Mr. Ryba suggested they would be used on other parts of the site. Mr. Zergott suggested columnar trees are made for tight areas. He would also like to request that the landbanked area have a landscaping design included, as it is the boards opinion that you will need to use the landbanked parking. Mr. Ryba indicated the only time the parking lot is at full capacity is during the Easter and Christmas holidays. No further questions were asked. B. Zergott motioned to except the St. Richard's proposal as presented with the conditions that we are supplied with a landscape design for the new construction and to get into the minutes that if the landbanked parking is ever used that a substantial landscape plan be brought together as it is near residential homes. The landscape plan is to be submitted before this goes before the Board of Zoning and Development. The motion was seconded by T. Liggett, and unanimously approved. Motion Carriecl. B) K.H.K. Properties, 23790 Lorain Road The proposal is to construct a 2,450 square foot, two story addition. Referred by Planning Commission October 13, 1998. Planning commission request the following variances be approved: 1). A special permit to add to a non conforming building. Which is Violation of Ord. 90-125, Section 1165.02 2). A 6' foot west side yard variance for building addition. 3). A 6' foot west side yard variance for parking lot. 4). A 10' foot east side yard variance for parking lot. Which is Violation of Ord. 90-125, Section 1165.02 Additionally, the following items are not disclosed on the drawing and must be complied with. 1161.11 A continuous concrete curbing for new parking is required. All parking surfaces must be of concrete or bituminous concrete paving. Drainage for new lot is to be installed as per the engineering departments requirements. Mr. Kuper, from the accounting firm which owns the building presented the proposal. The dentist that rents the bottom back of the building has asked us to expand the building so he could do more work on site. The dentist will occupy the bottom floor of the new addition, and the second floor will be used as general office space. There is up-down lighting along the building which will be maintained and used in the addition. There is an existing street light in the back of the lot that lights up the back parking area. The brick color and texture will be the same but the size of the existing brick could not be found. The window design will be the same vertical pattern, the architect has indicated dryvit. Mr. Liggett indicated a spandrel glass would look better. The upper portion should stay the dryvit material to keep it consistent. The front of the building has had modifications made to it, the aluminum frame windows to match the glass, and we will continue this in the new addition. Mr. Liggett asked about the landscaping, and indicated this architect has been told about the lack of landscape plans that they have submitted. Mr. Kuper