Laserfiche WebLink
.,.? <br />this wall matters as long as they reface it to match the C. V. S. building. Mr. Yager accepted <br />the brick as well as the stucco in the sign band area but had some concerns regard.ing the <br />plexiglass materiaL The clerk questioned if there was a print out available showing the style, <br />colors, and manufacturors of the materials. Although Mr. Petros did not have a colored <br />rendering of the building, he assured the board all materials will match the C. V. S. building <br />and agreed to provide the clerk with a listing of materials for the file. Mr. Yager noted the <br />proportions of the sign facia takes away from the columns, as it appears as if the facia is <br />pushing down the columns rather than the columns supporting the building. He suggested <br />taking eight to ten inches off the sign band area to allow for the enlargement of the columns. <br />Mr. Zergott suggested incorporating brick along the bottom 2 or three feet of the building as <br />the E.F.I. S. system will deteriorate over time. Mr. Petros agreed to raise the columns <br />accordingly and incorporate the brick along the bottom two feet of the building as suggested. <br />Mr. Yager noted there are to be no visible mechanical units and questioned the height of the <br />parapet. Mr. Petros stated the parapet is approximately 18 inches high and he agreed to hide <br />the roof top equipment. It was noted the doors in the back will be painted to match the <br />brick. <br />M. Yager motioned to recommend approval of the Retail Today (Former Krogars <br />Supermarket) located on the East side of Clague Road, South adjacent to the proposed CVS <br />Pharmacy, a proposal consisting of renovations and reduction of existing structure, with the <br />following comments: that the columns grow to be more in porportion and reduce the <br />phyisical size of the sign band to accomodate it; that the brick base be high enough to absorb <br />any punishment from the carts and such; and that there be no visible mechanical units. The <br />motion was seconded by B. Zergott and unanimously approved. It was noted final approval <br />on this submission may be delayed until August, as council has taken a vacation for the entire <br />month of July. <br />2) Bakers Square 24025 Lorain Road: <br />Proposal consists of exterior re-imaging, lighting, and signage. Refened by planning <br />commission May 26, 1998. Mr. Forester, architect presented the proposal and introduced <br />W. Tapanic, local general manager and Mr. Bateman, local associate manager. Mr. Forester <br />explained the proposal includes: adding one pole light with fixture on the north side of the <br />building; adding an extra fixtu.re to the existing pole lights that are directed toward the <br />restaurant; painting the outside ofthe building; replacing the front entry doors; replacing the <br />roof with a new standing seam metal roof in lieu of concrete tile; a new gable dormer on the <br />front elevation to allow an area for wall signage; incoiporating roof lights to match other <br />Baker's Square buildings in the area; adding some accent lighting to the front to outline the <br />roof; and the overhead soffit lights will be replaced with directional down light only. <br />Photographs were presented showing what the building is to look like during different times <br />of the day and iught. Mr. Yager questioned if there is any overIlow from the street light at <br />the front of the building onto this lot. Mr. Forester responded generally the street lights <br />would have little illumination on the lot as they are d.irected towards the street. He noted the <br />amount of illumination from the existing street lights were not included in the photometric <br />plan presented. In response to a question from Mr. Yager, Mr. Forester agreed the style of <br />the lights would match the existing. He stated the pole lights will have both a rear integral <br />cut-off shield as well as an external and side mounted shield. The intent of using the shields <br />was to reduce the amount of lighting to zero foot candles at the property line: Pictures were <br />presented showing the lights mounted on the roof top. In reviewing the drawings, Mr. Yager <br />noted the fixhue style for the roof lights will detract from the appearance of the building. He