My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03/18/1998 Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Boards and Commissions
>
1998
>
1998 Architectural Review Board
>
03/18/1998 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2019 12:47:51 PM
Creation date
1/28/2019 3:24:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
N Olmsted Boards & Commissions
Year
1998
Board Name
Architectural Review Board
Document Name
Minutes
Date
3/18/1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
? <br />1998 if the developer wants to present a compromise. He cautioned regardless of the <br />recommendation of this board, Candlewood will have at least two more hurdles including city <br />council. Mr. McI{ay maintained as a member of the B.Z.D. committee of council he would not <br />recommend approval of the proposal if the developer refuses to incorporate some brick. Mr. <br />Nemecek requested the opportunity to come back before architectural review board and submit <br />something that would incorporate a brick materiaL Mr. Conway questioned if the developer <br />intends to go before board of zoning appeals next week as if they are a recommendation from <br />architectural review board would be needed relative to the signage. It was noted if this did not <br />get referred to board of zoning appeals for the March 26, 1998 meeting, the proposal would not <br />be heard until the next meeting which is May.7, 1998. Mr. Nemecek advised he would like to be <br />heard at the board of zoning appeals meeting of March 26, 1998. On the signage, Mr. Yager <br />recommended removing the verbiage "where value stays" and removing the logo in between the <br />two double letter o's in Candlewood to make it easier to read. <br />M. Yager motioned to send Candlewood to the board of zoning appeals with the following <br />recommendations that the facade be entirely brick, the sign program consist of the monument sign <br />with logo, and to eliminate the words "where value stays", the building signs fall within the limit <br />height wise and remove the logos. We accept the sign on the east facade and that there be a <br />canopy without a sign on it. In the framing of the motion Mr. Yager stated this will return to <br />architectural review board next meeting dated Apri122, 1998. The motion was seconded by T. <br />Liggett. Roll call on the motion, Liggett, yes Yager, yes Zerggot abstain. motion carried. <br />2) Faiiview West Physicians Center, 24700 Lorain Road <br />Proposal to construct a three story addition to existing Physicians Center, which will include a <br />new parking area and lot renovations. <br />Mr. Libassi, architect; Mr. Priest, landscape designer; and Mr. Zabatnik, representing Fairview <br />West Hospital presented the proposaL Mrs. Collier, a concemed resident, asked if the residents <br />can comment on the proposal first. Chairman Zergott advised he would follow the typical <br />procedure and allow the architect to make a presentation first. It was noted Fairview West <br />Physicians Center is located on the corner of Lorain and Columbia Roads. Mr. Libassi advised he <br />would explain the floor plan and function of the building, and Mr. Priest would address the <br />landscaping, parking lot and site lighting later. Mr. Libassi stated space was intentionally left <br />when the original building was constructed for this type of expansion. Photographs were <br />presented which depict the existing bu.ilding from various angles as well as pictures taken of the <br />surrounding buildings. The proposed expansion would increase the size of the building as follows: <br />11,000 square feet on the first floor, 5,000 square feet on tlie second floor and 5,000 square feet <br />on the third floor. W. Libassi began explaining first floor plan and was informed by Mr. Zergott <br />that this board is responsible for reviewing the outside of the building so details about the inside <br />of the build.ing were not necessary. The second and third floors of the expansion will match the <br />existing materials meaning the same building will be extended two bays. Mr. Libassi advised the <br />Dryvit material is a shade darker than the colored rendition presented, but he confirmed the Dryvit <br />on the new building will match the existing build.ing. The windows on the second floor are lower <br />than the roof line to the west so that anyone with lease space on the second floor will have an <br />adequate window and will not be looking out over the roof of the smaller building. Mr. Libassi
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.