Laserfiche WebLink
e <br />the conditional use permit approved and requested a meeting date where this can be discussed in <br />more detail. The clerk explained that plauning commission recommended that council approve <br />the conditional use permit and the proposal did not have to return to planning commission. Mr. <br />Conway added the conditional use request is not approved until finalized by a vote of city council. <br />He recommended that the residents contact the clerk of council for information on meeting dates. <br />An unidentified resident suggested expanding into the commercial areas. Mr. Yager maintained <br />this review board has no control over where the developer chooses to expand. Mr. Zergott <br />elaborated this board attempts to make developments more appealing, but cannot rule on whether <br />this development should be permitted or how many parking spots are permitted etc. Mrs. Collier <br />questioned if the comments from the residents will be in the minutes, and the board agreed <br />everyone would be on record. She requested that the city officials protect the nature of this <br />residential neighborhood. Mr. H'ilpert wondered how long the fence would be and was advised <br />approximately 400 feet. Mr. I?'ilpert noted at the last planning commission meeting the abutting <br />neighbor requested that the fence line stop far enough away from the right-of-way line so as not <br />to obstruct the residents view when entering/exiting his driveway. Mr. Conway advised the fence <br />should be far enough back so as not to obstruct the resident's view of the sidewalk. Mr: Zergott <br />questioned if there is room along Columbia Road to extend the landscaping along the entire east <br />side of the property as there were only six Austrian Pines shown along Columbia Road. The issue <br />of signage will be addressed at a later date. Mr. Liggett noted he likes how the building <br />expansion has been laid out, however, he despised the metal fence down near the grou.nd. He <br />suggested continuing the masonry material or another unit that will compliment the void 'mside <br />there. Mr. Yager questioned what the first level screen wall will hide. W. Libassi stated this is a <br />delivery area and there is also an emergency generator. It was noted there is an existing canopy <br />that will remain, and there will be a new canopy at the south side entrance. Mr. Yager liked the <br />plan but on the south elevation, he recommended placing reveals in the block on the north side of <br />the south elevation to suggest some playfulness with the window patterning. Mr. Libassi advised <br />he would like to do some things with the canopy, however the funds are not available. Mr. Yager <br />suggested that they find the funds to do something with the canopy so that the building looks <br />more updated. He recommended that t,his be resubmitted with the signage for an independent <br />review so that it would not have to come back before the board. An unidentified resident <br />questioned if their tax dollars would go towards the construction of this canopy. Mr: Liggett <br />advised the canopy would be purely the owners expense. The same resident questioned if the city <br />would benefit from this development. Mr. Zergott suggested that the resident raise this issue at <br />the council meeting. Mr. Yager reiterated the boards goal is to take the plans submitted and <br />suggest changes to make the submittal as nice as possible. He noted this board cannot reject <br />construction outright, but can make recommendations to make the building and site look it's very <br />best. Mr. Collier stated the point in presenting their ideas to the developer is to promote a better <br />altemative. In addition to increasing the landscaping along Columbia Road, Mr. Zergott <br />suggested using larger trees. He noted a survey was not conducted on the amount of trees being <br />removed because of the new parking lot. Mr. Priest noted the gray tone trees will be removed, <br />and the dark tone trees will remain. Mr. Zergott suggested adding some Maples or Oak trees to <br />the back green space along the northem portion as the Euonymus are not going to look good <br />from the outside. Mr. Zergott would like to see a revised landscaping plan prior to this going to <br />the b.z.d. committee of counciL As there were a number of trees close to the new parking, Mr. <br />Zergott requested that the city forester be provided with information on the proposal so that we