12/03/1998 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

didn't appear to be a logo just artwork. Mr. Antal indicated it was clip art and not a registered logo. Mr. Kremzar suggested the logos looked like the Motorola trademark and Mr. Antal should get in vvi7ting their permission to use the flip phones on his sign. Mr. Antal indicated he had contacted Motorola and its useable shared ware. Mr. Maloney strongly suggested to Mr. Antal he should get permission in vvi-iting from Motorola because of a possible lawsuit. J. Maloney moved to grant the request to Pro Con, 26400 Lorain Road, Their request for variance 1123.12. 1) A 14' square foot variance for total business signage, section (1163.11(c)) 2) A variance to install two wall signs (only 1 is permitted) with cell phone artwork, as presented, section(1163.12(a)). Furthermore Pro-Con will be allowed to have the artwork (2 cell phones) as presented to the Commissioners. Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125, section (1163.16 (D)),1163.11(c), and (1163.12(a)). The motion was seconded by W. Kremzar, and unanimously approved. Variances granted. - 3. Russell Barnett; 25021 Linda Drive, North Olmsted, OH 44070 : Request for variance (1123.12). Proposal is to add an Aluininum patio enclosure. Request the following variance: 1) A 20' foot rear yard setback variance is requued (1135.08 (a). Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125, section 1135.08 (a). Request a special permit to add to a non conforming building. Ord. 90-125, section (1123.08). Chairman Gomersall called all interested parties before the board. The oath was adininistered to Mr. Barnett, owner of the property, and Mr. Santora, contractor. Mr. Santora indicated to Commissioners that the aluminum patio enclosure was going to be built on top of the existing deck. Mfi-. Koberna questioned Mr. Santora if the patio enclosure would conform to the outline of the existing deck . Mr. Santora indicated it would be bay shaped with a gable roof. The Commissioners did not have a problem with the patio enclosure. Mr. Kremzar moved to grant Mr. Bamett , 25021 Linda Drive, their request for variance (1123.12). 1) A 20' foot rear yard setback variance as required (1135.08 (a). Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125, section 1135.08(a). A special permit as requested to add to a non conforming building. Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125, section (1123.08). The motion was seconded by J. Maloney, and unanimously approved. Variance grantedo 4. Mr. & Mrs. Biesiadnv; 4563 Georgette Avenue: Request for variance (1123.12). Proposal is to add a family roomto existing home. Request the following variance: A 6' foot 6" inch variance is required from house to garage (1123.09 Note: Addition will be closer then 15' feet from existing garage, therefore the Building departanent requests the garage be fitted with 1 hour rated fire code clrywall. "If a variance is granted." Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125, section 1123.09. 2