02/11/1998 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

• „``* ? a},? }, ? . duty paving has been implemented, so that there is no problem with the trucks tearing up the asphalt. He stated it was agreed the trucks would pull up away from the residential area up along the north west corner of the building so that it is as far as practicable from the residents. Ms. Oring stated since the superstore is uuknown the amount of truck traffic cannot be estimated. She further advised the developer agreed to have controlled delivery. Mr. Banow advised there are ordinances that provide for delivery time frames as the councilman explained at B.Z.D. Ms. Oring wondered if three trucks pulled up to the loading docks, where the extra truck wou.ld wait. M.T. Bairow clarified the loading docks will be large enough to accommodate five trucks. Ms. Oring questioned if the amount of trucks would then be limited to five. Mr. Banow could not guarantee how many trucks would arrive at one time, however he is not the operator of the ordinance. Mr. Herschmann added this stores approach for trucks is the most remote part from the residential area that you can possibly be on the site. In that agreement the earth mound and density of the landscaping has increased in concurrence with the architectural review board. Mr. Herschmaun stated this has all been discussed at previous meetings. Ms. Oring stated she attended all the meetings and understood that there was going to be a holding area for the trucks. Mr. Maloney noted there were cars for Snappy Car Rental parked in the grassy area in the back, he wondered if there would be parking permitted back in that area. Mr. Barrow advised there is some landbanked parking in that area. Ms. Canwright had concerns about traffic cutting through the condominium property in an attempt to get to the superstore, and questioned if signs can be posted to prevent cut through traffic. Mr. Maloney questioned if this was discussed at planning commission. Mr. Banow did not believe it was discussed at planning commission. Mr. Gareau advised this should have been raised at plauniug commission as board of zoning appeals is dealing with one issue concerning the superstore. Mr. Maloney advised this would go back to plaunuig commission. Assistant Bu.ilding Commissioner Rymarczyk advised it would not go back to planning commission. Ms. Oring cited two different places in the minutes where the developer agreed to retuxn with elevation's of the superstore. Mr. Barrow explained when the tenant is identified they will have to come back and fill out an application just like anyone else. T. Kobema moved to grant Developers Diversified Realty Corporation, 25853 thru 26429 Great Northem Shopping Center and 5078 thru 5194 Great Northern Plaza South, the following variances: a variance to have a superstore on a lot that is not 60% within 1/2 mile of an Interstate Highway Interchange, and a variance of 2.05% for excess lot coverage (25% allowed by codes and 27.05% is shown on plan). Violarion of Ord. 90-125, Section(s) 1129.11 (B-4), 1139.05, and 1139.07. The motion was seconded by J. Konold and unauimously approved. Variance granted. 5. ICI Dulux Paints (Glidden), 4647 Great Northern Blvd. Request for variance (1123.12). Request 9 square foot variance for sign area for total business unit. Violation of Ord. 90-125, Section 1163.11(c). Note: The square footage calculations are predicated on the removal of non-conforming pole sign January 1, 1998. Vice-Chairman Maloney called all interested parties before the board. The oath was administered to Mr. Helsel, sign contractor. Mr. Helsel agreed the pole sign will be removed at the time the wall signage is erected. W. Purper moved to grant ICI Du1ux Paints (Glidden), 4647 Great Norfhern Blvd., a 9 foot variance for sign area for total business unit predicated on the removal of the non-conforming pole 6