Laserfiche WebLink
.? <br />a_ <br />ordinance. If the overlay goes through the City will be able to do what they want without the <br />citizens having a say so. Mr. Dubelko commented that the overlay district is a concept that has <br />been used in zoning for at least 20 years around the State. What it enables a City to do is zone <br />land in a different way then what is traditional. Traditional zoning is called Euclidean zoning. In <br />Traditional zoning, district go from the least to the most restricted zoning, which is residential. <br />That is how zoning has traditionally been, but overlay departs from that by allowing a City to <br />iinpose this overlay district on top of the existing Euclidean zoning -- often times governed by <br />geographical locations spread though out the City. It is like spot zoning, but is based on pursuit <br />of a governmental interest and often times determined by the geographical characteristics of land. <br />The City's first overlay district that hasn't passed yet took place last year. In the <br />telecommunications district, what areas in the City, which were determined to be appropriate for <br />telecommunication towers were those which were expected to have the least impact on residential <br />areas. He feels that the City is proceeding in the same manner with the proposed overlay district <br />for governmental uses by looking for areas that are appropriate for government buildings <br />throughout the City. It wouldn't fit doing it in the traditional way of going from least restrictive <br />to most restrictive classifications because government facilities could be located in all different <br />districts throughout the City. The nice thing about overlay regarding these parcels is that it is not <br />being rezoned out of single family into a commercial or other less restrictive zone. It is being kept <br />as single family with the understanding that the overlay zoning is being placed on top of it to <br />permit only governmental uses in addition to single family. The residents should not get the <br />impression that the overlay ordinance allows the City the ability to do what ever it wants to do. <br />Ms. Metter suggested that she was bothered by the word imposed and government, rather than <br />what the people want. How does the fact that 3 board members are absent tonight effect the <br />ability to vote on the issues? An unidentified audience member indicated that he felt that in order <br />to get an RTA park and ride in a fashion that we feel has an acceptable outcome as far as noise, <br />traffic, air and other pollutants and other hard ships. He feels that the resident's best leverage is <br />clearly that it is currently zoned residential and RTA it is not allowed in that zone. Therefore we <br />have as layman a better chance of fighting the argument and turning this threat maybe not the next <br />threat but this threat that we want to detour. The only leverage we have is the zoning and once <br />we give that away then as the board says itself we come to a different set of criteria. Now is our <br />only time of bargaining and while our voices will not be completely taken out of it our will, will. <br />We will be at the mercy of what the boards can enforce through the other ordinances and what <br />RTA is willing to give us and once those go to court it is out of every ones hands. Once the <br />Planning Commission opens the door for an overlay district our positions as citizens is severally <br />weakened. The City is giving away the horse before we even have anything that is a respectful <br />response to previous aired concerns. We haven't gotten any response from the City on how to <br />address this and we have asked. Mr. Dubelko indicated that this is part of the process. You <br />cannot put the cart before the horse. The first obligation is for the City to take a position as to <br />whether or not it desires to have RTA build a park and ride here. The process has begun in favor <br />of that by proposing to rezone the property to permit it, which is the first stage of the process <br />where the citizens have input with respect to what are the requirements for the overlay district, <br />for example, the front yard setbacks and rear yard setbacks as minimums of the code as he <br />indicated earlier. Each chapter of the zoning code creating a district has certain restrictions for <br />any use that goes in, and those are minimums that any proposal that would come after rezoning <br />would have to meet. Our code requires that once a proposal is submitted the developer is <br />11