Laserfiche WebLink
?I <br />'11` . <br />that adds on to present section 119.01 to impose as an additional requirement before a building <br />permit is issued. Until the applicant first submits to the Building official a statement from the <br />County Auditor certifying that all real property taxes have been paid. It will only apply to <br />commercial and new residential construction. Mr. Spalding commented that he was presently <br />involved with a client that had to enter into an agreement with the County Auditor as to the <br />payment of back taxes. He feels that that is reasonable if there is an agreement, otherwise the <br />applicant may run into a bind. He asked if the subject of an agreement with the County Auditor <br />was brought up for the current proposal. Mr. Dubelko suggested he did not think an agreement <br />had been taken into consideration when the ordinance was being drawn up, but felt it made since. <br />Mr. Spalding indicated that he would like to make sure the suggestion of an agreement is added <br />to the ordinance. Mr. Tallon indicated that he thought it would be a good idea to recommend to <br />Council that a legal agreement with the County Auditor be included to the ordinance. Mr. <br />Dubelko indicated that he could see circumstances where the applicant purchases the property <br />with delinquent taxes and makes an arraignment that the County Auditor is satisfied with. Mr. <br />Koeth questioned if other Municipalities had ordinances like this one. Mr. Dubelko indicated that <br />he was not aware of any other Municipality that had an ordinance like this one. Mr. Dubelko <br />indicated that Councilman Miller had sponsored other ordinances in this direction such as the one <br />that he asked to be withdrawn. It dealt with the issue of making sure that payroll taxes were <br />protected before occupancy permits were granted. He is not sure if there had been complaints ar <br />trying to increase revenue. Mr. Tallon suggested that in the past there have been construction <br />sites that have used imported labor. There is no way to know if the workers are being paid. The <br />ordinance is not a burden on anyone. <br />R. Tallon motioned to adopt Ordinance No. 99-113, with the inclusion of: If the developer has <br />made arrangements with the County Auditor to pay his back tax's and receives documentation <br />from the County Auditor certifying that there is an agreement, then it would be sufficient. The <br />motion was seconded by R. Koeth and unanimously approved. Motion Carried. <br />5). Ordinance No. 99-127: An ordinance providing for the amendment of the Zone Map of the <br />City of North Olmsted by changing the hereinafter described parcels of real property located on <br />Kennedy Ridge Road from mixed use district to Single Family Cluster District. <br />Mr. Dubelko reviewed that the property was west of Bridal wood, which is vacant. There was a <br />proposal discussed about placing multi-family housing on the lot and for some reason it never <br />came about. There is a filling by Councilman 1VIcKay and Gareau Jr. that it would be better to <br />have single family cluster rather than multi-family. He believes that both Councilmen would agree <br />to address rezoning during the review of the Master Plan, but felt there has been talk of a multi- <br />family complex in the past, therefore they feel it should be addressed now. Mr. Spalding indicated <br />that Mr. Burns talked to him about the 1993 master plan in which this was supposed to be single <br />family. Mr. Dubelko suggested that was incorrect it was either multi-family or senior citizens. <br />Mr. Dubelko indicated that the parcel was not senior citizen or multi-family, but it is a more dense <br />zoning then single family, Mr. Spalding questioned what type of residentia.l zoning was near the <br />area. Such as A, B, or C. Mr. Tallon indicated that the board was in the process of reviewing the <br />Master Plan and he would like to table the rezoning until the board finishes their review. Mr. <br />Dubelko indicated that that was up to the Planning Commissions discretion, but he would say on <br />6