07/27/1999 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

,Ji start some work. He doesn't want to see Horizons lose time. He suggested that maybe Horizons could start the demolition of tlle existing building, and questioned Mr. Rymarczyk if they could start the demolition. Mr. Rymarczyk indicated that Horizons could apply for a demolition pernut, but it would take the building department two weeks before they could issue the permit as the plan need to be reviewed by the Fire department. Mr. Koeth reviewed that the Architectural Review Board has asked for changes and we need to review these changes before they move on. Mr. Brennan suggested that they should be allowed to move on and come back to address the outside issues. Mr. Koeth reiterated that he would like to see the materials that will be used as well as the lighting and the requested changes that the Architectural Review Board made. Mr. Tallon commented that at the first Planning Commission meeting he requested that the developer provide samples of the materials that would be used as well as the opportunity to review the changes requested by the Architectural Review Board at this meeting. Mr. Grassa indicated tliat he had misunderstood Mr. Tallon's request he thought he only needed the materials for the Architectural Review Board. Mr. Koeth indicated that he didn't want to see the plans just shot through. Mrs. 0'Rourke suggested only bringing back the lighting; landscaping and columns for review, as they were more cosmetic issues. Mr. Brennan questioned where does the board draw the line as to what comes back, for example the existing chain link fence, will it be vinyl coated or will it be left to rust, that issue has never been brought forth. Mr. Grassa indicated that it would be vinyl coated. Mr. Brennan indicated these are the types of issues that could still be brought up and compound one on top of the other without having a completed site plan. Mr. Tallon suggested the board is not trying to be hard nosed, but their needs to be a set of completed site plans. He questioned if there was anyone present in the audience that would like to make any comments. As no one came fonvard, no further comments were made. R. Tallon motioned to table Horizons proposal until the next regularly scheduled meeting. The developer is to bring in a set of completed pla.ns showing all the changes in the lighting, landscaping, how they address the comments from the Architectural Review Board, the fence, and the safety issues incorporated into the plans. The new water hydrant is to be indicated on the new plans as well as the building entrance changes. The Planning Commission would also like to see building materials, color samples and photometric for the lighting fixtures. The motion was seconded by R. Koeth. Roll call on the motion; R. Tallon; yes, R. Koeth; yes, K. O'Rourke; abstain, S. Asseff; yes, T. Brennan; yes, and W. Spalding; abstain. Proposal Tabled. AT'THE 1tEQUEST OF THE APPLICANT CHILD'S VIEdV WAS WITHDRAWN FRO1VI THE AGENd)A 2). A Child's View -#2; 24749 Lorain Road: Proposal consists of requesting a Conditional Use Pernut to operate a daycare center in a General Business District. The doors in the front will be modified and a fenced in play area will be added to the rear of the building. NOTE: A variance for blocking 10 required parking spaces with the outdoor play area is required, (1161.03). IV. NEW DEVELOPMENTS AND SUBDIVISIONS: V. COMMUNICATIONS: At the Written request of Councilman, Michael Gareau Jr., Ordinance N0. 99-83 will be reevaluated: Said ordinance provides for the amendment of the zone map of the City of North Olmsted by changing the hereinafter described parcels of real property located on Dewey Road, North of Lorain Road, from single 4