03/09/1999 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

? one would be blocked. Mr. Koeth asked if there were any questions from the audience. Mr. Clough, a resident on Root Road indicated he was concerned the applicants would be building on the lots and asked how close the lots would comecto his. Mrs. Jones indicated nothing was being built, everything was pre- existing they were really only asking for easements. Mr. Koeth motioned to recommend that the Jones/Andrews/Dansberg, lot split and consolidation plot revised with the re-alignment of parcel's 4232-32-09, 4232-32-10, and 232-32-023 each currently having structures on them, be sent to the Board of Zoning Appeals board. The Planning Commission recommends that the Board of Zoning Appeals board approve the cross easement and that the variances be noted on the plot plans. The centerline for the relocated State Route 252 is to be shown on the plans. Mr. Dubelko indicated the board needed to add a note which indicated, that the proposed plan is identical to the one submitted to the Planning Commission on January 12, 1999, and was denied. It should also be noted that this plan had been changed to add another parcel for better planning to access Root Road. The motion was seconded by W. Spalding and unanimously approved. 1dlotion Carried. In the framing of the motion the clerk announced, that the case would go before the Board of Zoning Appeals board on April 1, 1999. She also reviewed that the applicants would need to submit new plans and pay the required fee in the Building Department, to go before the Board of Zoning Appeals board. The clerk announced no fiirther notifications would be sent out. Mr. McDermott asked for clarification, on whether or not the case would need to return to the Planning Commission, after going to the Board of Zoning Appeals. Mr. Dubelko indicated the case would not need to return to the Planning Commission. 2). Lusardo Homes; Subdivision, Preliminarv plan: The proposal is to subdivide permanent parcel no. 236-10-008 into five (5) residential lots. Location is the south side of Kennedy Ridge Road at the east adjacent I-480 right-of-way. Zoning is "B" Residence, Single entirely and all lots conform to Zoning Code requirements for area and frontage; one proposed lot has insufficient lot depth. Note: Variaiice may be required. Acting Chairman, R. Koeth called all interested parties forward to present their proposal. Mr. Lusardo, owner of the property came forward. He indicated that it was a simple re-subdivision to five single- family residential lots. He suggested everything complies with sizing, but he noted that on sub lot 91 there maybe a variance needed. Mr. Koeth asked Mr. Rymarczyk if a variance would be needed. Mr. Rymarczyk indicated that a variance would be required for the depth of the lot. B residences are required to be 70'feet wide at all points and the last 15'feet would be less than 135'feet. Mr. Lusardo suggested sub lot 41 could be moved westerly 84'feet and still maintain their 50'foot rear yard setback and their 50'foot setback. He suggested he had spoken with Building Commissioner, Gonway who indicated, when a rear lot line is irregular they average the two. Mr. Lusardo suggested there was plenty of land to build a stnicture on and still have excess 100' feet of land in the back. Mrs. 0'Rourke questioned what abuts sub lot #5 on the west and southwest. Mr. Lusardo indicated the lot abuts a residence on the West. The Southwest abuts interstate 480 as well as a bike trail. He suggested the storm sewers would be extended froin the easterly lot line, with a 10"inch storm sewer along the front of the lots into the existing storm sewer. The electric, gas and sanitary sewers are already in place. Mr. Koeth questioned what type of homes would be built. Mr. Lusardo indicated he would build typical single family homes, colonials or ranches. He designs homes for people and they are usually sold before he starts building. Mr. Koeth questioned if Mr. Lusardo intended on shifting sub lot 41 so it would not need variances. Mr. Lusardo indicated sub lot 41 was twice the width of the other lots. He indicated the extra 90'feet would not be able to be used, so he would incorporate it into sub lot 41 to be part of the yard. Mr. Hreha questioned if the north and south symbols had reversed on the drawings. Mr. Lusardo indicated that the engineer had reversed north and south on the insert map. Mrs. O'Rourke indicated that since Sub lot 41 had eYtra space would it be sold for the same price. Mr. Lusardo indicated that it would be the sarrie, as it would be too costly to try to fan the other lots. Mr. Dubelko, suggested it was his understanding, that if the developers diminish the frontage he could create a conforming lot, but would have less space with respect to the depth. He believed the variance was needed because the depth averaged out. Mr. Lusardo indicated the variance was needed because the sideyard was 70'feet deep. Mr. Dubelko reiterated if the east lot line was moved over would he have a conforming lot. Mr. Lusardo indicated no; he would still need a variance. Mr. Koeth opened the floor for questions. Ms. Schroder, a resident on Kennedy Ridge came forward and indicated she was concerned about the drainage and sewers as they have had problems with water backups in their basements. Mr. McDermott indicated the developer was to submit plans,