01/12/1999 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

.; then part of the motion w711 be that the permit not be issued until the proper drawings are submitted to the Building department. Mr. Tallon asked if there was any other lighting added_ Mr. Schill suggested no other lighting was added. Mr. Tallon questioned what material would be used on the north east side of the building. Mr. Schill iriclicated it would be inscribed into the foam before it is finished. Mr. Brennan questioned if it was just a reset drivit reveal. Mr. Schill suggested Mr. Brennan was correct it would be an inward pointing V that is reassessed in about an inch. For a shadow line. Mr. Tallon asked if there was anyone in the audience that had questions they would like to address regarding the proposal. No further questions were asked. Mr. Tallon indicated that since a variance was needed he would make two motions, one on the variance and one on the proposal. R. Tallon motioned to send Norwalk Furniture to the Board of Zoning Appeals for the variance to allow logos on the awnuigs and the motions is to recommend that the Board of Zoning Appeals not allow the logo's on the avcnings as this is eYCessive signage and we don't need any more signage on the building The motion was seconded by T. Brennan, and Unanimously approved. Motion Carried. R. Tallon motioned to eYCept the proposal for the renovation of the eYterior and interior tenant space in eXisting shopping center for Norwallc Furniture, based on the new prints received b_y the Building Departrnent on December 29, 1998. Added to this motion that the proper lighting print must be received by the Building Department before releasing the permits. The motion was seconded by T. Brennan and, Unanimously approved. Motion Carried. In the framing of the motion Mr. Tallon indicated that Norwalk Furniture could go to the Board of Zoning and Development board before going to the Board of Zoning Appeals board if a Board of Zoning and Development meeting was held before the Board of Zoning Appeals meeting date. The clerk advised the applicant that the Board of Zoning Appeals meeting would be F'ebruary 4, 1999 at 7:30 p.m., and no further notices would be sent out. B) Columbia Road Baptist Church; 4116 Columbia Road: Proposal consists of master plan showing future additions. Note: Variances will be required. Chairman Tallon reviewed Columbia Road Baptist Church's request and called all interested parties forward to present their proposal. Pastor Jenkins suggested they were here to submit a master plan of what the church hopes to build in the future as well as an unmediate plan to build a fellowship hall. Last year the church added an addition and this year we would like to build the fellowship hall. Pastor Jenkins introduced Mr. Saunders the architect and indicated he would review the churches plans. Mr. Satulders suggested the set of prints that were submitted showed the overall plans of the church. Mr. Brennan suggested he saw a fellowship hall with a hall X'ed out next to it. Mr. Saunders suggested the new addition would be the north west addition on the plans, Mr. Tallon asked Mr. Saunders to approach the bench and review the plans closer. Mr. Saunders indicated that phase three is the north west addition, which they would like to do now, and the south east addition would be started 5 years from now. Mr. Rymarczyk pointed out to the board members were the atrium was located on the map. Mr. Saunders indicated it will be part of phase N. Mr. Tallon indicated he would prefer to call the new north west elevation addition phase H. Mr. Tallon asked Mr. Saunders to start at phase II and continue. Mr. Saunders suggested the plans show were phase two will be located in proportion to the rest of the building. He would now like to review the property that surrounds the church as well as the variances that they would like to have. Mr. Brennan suggested since phase IV will not be started for five years why don't we limit our discussion to phase II for now, and discuss the variance that is needed for that phase. Mr. Saunder agreed to review phase two, but indicated they would like the boards opinion on the overall plan. Mr. Tallon asked Mr. Rymarczyk what variances would be needed. Mr. Rymarczyk suggested for phase II only a 30' foot side setback variance is needed. Mr. Tallon asked Mr. Rymarczyk if a parking variance would be needed with the next addition. Mr. Rymarczyk suggested they would not, as they show landbanked parking in the front. Mr. Saunders reviewed the parking that exist and the proposed parking that will be added in the future. Mr. Tallon asked if the front setback is 50' feet. Mr. Rymarczyk indicated Mr. Tallon was correct. Ms. 0'Rourke questioned if the dwellings next to the church were privately owned. Mr. Saunders indicated Ms. 0'Rourke was correct. Mr. Tallon asked the clerk to find out about 2