11/04/1999 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

,. , Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 sections, (1163.12 B) and (1161.05). Note: A pole sign demolition ? pernut has been issued. The motion was seconded by W. Kremzar and unanimously approved. Variances Granted. 14. The Olive Garden: 25984 Lorain Rd. Request for variance (1123.12). The proposal consists of a sign package. The following variances are requested: 1) A 3 foot height variance for a ground sign, (code pernuts 5 ft., applicant shows 8ft), section (1163.12 B). 2) A 6 inch height variance for a wall sign, (code permits 4 ft., applicant shows 4 ft. 6 inch), section (1163.12 A). 3) An appeal for uistalling a logo sign, Section, (1163.16 D). Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 section, (1163.12 B), (1163.12 A), (1163.16 U). Chairman Gomersall called all interested parties forward, and reviewed the variances requested. Mr. Lombardi from Boyer Signs came forward to review the request. Mr. Gomersall questioned if the grapes on the sign were the logo in question. Mr. Lombardi indicated he was correct. Mr. Gomersall questioned if anything would be done with the current pole sign. Mr. Lombardi suggested that the pole sign would be addressed once the Cities lawsuit was completed. Mr. Gomersall questioned if the applicant had changed his mind to request a ground sign. Mr. Lombardi indicated that the Olive Garden would keep the pole sign if the variances are not granted for the ground sign. Mr. Gareau commented that the applicants could not request to have a grotmd sign and a pole sign it would have to be one or the other. Mr. Maloney questioned if the variances were granted would the board need to address the appeal for the logo. Mr. Gareau indicated that the board could make it part of the motion to allow the logo. No further comments were made. J. Maloney moved to grant The Olive Garden of 25984 Lorain Rd. their request for variance (1123.12) as amended. Which consists of a sign package and that the following variances be granted: 1) A 3 foot height variance for a ground sign, which will include a logo (code pernuts 5 ft., applicant shows 8ft), section (1163.12 B). 2) A 6-inch height variance for a wall sign, which will also include a logo (code pernuts 4 ft., applicant shows 4 ft. 6 inch), section (1163.12 A). Wluch is in violation of Ord. 90-125 section, (1163.12 B), (1163.12 A). The motion was seconded by J. Konold and unanimously approved. Variances Granted. 15. J.C. Hair Desie,n; 28813 Lorain Road: Request for variance (1123.12). The proposal consists of installing a new access drive to rear parking area. The following variance is requested: 1) A 5.15-foot varia.nce for access drive width. (code requires 18 ft., applicant shows 12.85 ft.). Wluch is in violation of Ord. 90-125 section, (1161.10 B). Note: Per the BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS MEETING of 11/5/98. If landbanked parking is converted into a parking area, a fence is to be installed along the "ENTIRE" property line. Chairman Gomersall called all interested parties forward, and reviewed the variances requested. Ms. Kopko, with Mongello & Associates came forward to review the request. Ms. Kopko reviewed that the site surveyor made a mistake and the garage is closer to the house then what was thought. They would not be able to get an 18-foot drive back to the landbanked parking area. Mr. Koberna questioned if the parking was being added. He questioned if the safety vehicles would have a problem getting by the narrow drive. Ms. Kopko commented that safety vehicles would not have a problem reaching the back of the building. She suggested as there would only be 4 parking spaces they were not anticipating a lot of traffic in the area. She questioned if the fence would have to be placed around the entire property line. 9