09/02/1999 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

abutting neighbor suggested her home was 46 years old, and she commented that she welcomed the new house, as it was an asset to the neighborhood. W. Kremzar motioned to approve Donald Ross of 5890 Canterbury Road his request for variance (1123.12). Which consists of building a new garage and that the following variances be granted: A special pernut to add to a non-conforming building, (1165.02). An 8 foot 10inch variance for height of garage, (code allows 15ft, applicant shows 23ft l0inc), (1135.02 C1). Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 section, (1165.02) and (1135.02 C1). Note Garage is only 720 square feet. The motion was seconded by, W. Kremzar and unanunously approved. Variances Granted. 5. Carmen 8c Ramon Ortiz; 6753 Maple Hurst: Request for variance (1123.12). Proposal consists of a three-season room/deck. The following variance is required: 1) A 12 foot variance for rear yard setback, (code requires SOft, applicant shows 38ft). Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 section, (1135.08 A). Note: this is a corner lot. Acting Chairman Maloney called all interested parties forward, and reviewed the variance requested. Mr. Chaplin, the contractor for the applicant and Mr. & Mrs. IJhI, concern neighbors came forward. Mr. Chaplin indicated that the lot was a corner lot with an existing concrete patio and Mr. & Mrs. Ortiz would like to convert that into a 12-ft x 12ft 3-season enclosure to the rear of their home, which will require a variance o£ 12 feet. NTr. Maloney reiterated that the 3-season enclosure would be 12ft x 12ft., as the plans showed 12 foot x 8 feet. Mr. Chaplin indicated that there would also be a deck off the back of the 3- season room, which will be an additional 8 feet. Mr. Koberna indicated that the plans showed the room 12ft x 8ft with an additional 8 foot deck. Mr. Kremzar quested if the enclosure would be the entire width of the room. Mr. Chaplin indicated that he would be going the entire length of the room. Mr. Maloney indicated that he didn't have a problem with the request. Mr. iJhl indicated that he didn't have any complaints against the request. Mrs. Uhl suggested she didn't have a problem with the request, but she picked up a copy of the ordinance and indicated that the notice sited section 1135.08 A, but there is a corner lot requirement of 25 feet. She doesn't lrnow why it doesn't fall under 1135.06 for corner lots. She believes it should be changed, because it is misleading, as the front of the home fronts on Oakdale Drive. 1VIr. Conway indicated that the sections were properly sited. The infraction has no bearings on which way the house faces, it is the orientation of the lot. The applicant is not in violation of the corner or sideyard requirement he is in violation of the rear yard. Mr. Maloney indicated that the addition would be very nice. No further comments were made. J. Konold motioned to approve Carmen & Ramon Ortiz of 6753 Maple Hurst his request for variance (1123.12). Which consists of a tlu-ee-season room, deck and that the following variance be granted: 1) A 12 foot variance for rear yard setback, (code requires SOft, applicant shows 38ft). Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 section, (1135.08 A). The motion was seconded by T. Koberna and unanimously approved. Variance Granted. 6. Mr. & Mrs. Rick Busse; 6225 Winding Creek Lane Request for variance (1123.12). Proposal consists of a pool deck. The following variance is required: 1) A 364 square foot or (11.8%) variance for a pool deck, (code pernuts 616sq ft or (20%), applicant shows 980sq ft, (31.8), (1135.02 I)2). Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 section, (1135.02 D2). Acting Chairman Maloney called all interested parties forward, and reviewed the variance requested. Mr. Busse the owner, and the following concerned neighbors, Mr. & Ms. Ausse, Mr. Montalvo, and Councilman Nashar came forward. Mr. Busse indicated that he put a deck around the pool so it can be locked and his wife can view the children. The pool and deck have been offset in the yard. The railing 7