08/05/1999 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

been removed. Mr. Eppolito indicated that Mr. Gomersall was correct. He commented that one sign would be placed over the front of the common area and the second sign would be placed.over the door entrance. Mr. Koberna indicated that the applicant was basically just changing out the signs. All board members commented that they didn't mind the signs being changed. No further comments were made. J. Maloney motioned to approve Marshalls of 5170 Great Northern Mall their request for variance (1123.12). Which consists of a sign package and that the following variances be granted: 1) A 192.5 square foot variance for sign face area of a business unit, (code allows 35.5sq ft, applicant requests 228sq ft), (1163.11 C). 2) A 2 foot height variance for wall sign 42, (code allows 4ft high, applicant requests 6ft), (1163.12 A). 3) An 83 square foot variance for wall sign #2 face area, (code allows 75sq ft, applicant requests 158sq ft), ( 1163.12). Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 section, (1163.11 A) and (1163.12 A). The motion was seconded by W. Kremzar and tulanimously approved. Variances Granted 9. Jeff Dubecky; 30692 Lorain Road: Request for variance (1123.12). The proposal consists of a sign Package. The following variances are requested: 1) A variance to add a phone number to a pylon sign which is not pernutted by code, (1163.03 A 1 C). 2) A variance to have 3 services listed on a pylon sign, (code limits goods and services to 2), (1163.03 A 1 C). 3) A 5 foot R inch variance for side setback footage, (code requires 25ft, applicant shows 19ft 4"), (1163.12 B). 4) 2. 35square foot variances to construct pylon signs in 2 safety triangles, one being in their own and the second to be in their neighbor's to the west, (code stipulates No pylon signs shall be allowed within a triangle formed between points on the street right of way line and the nearest edge of an intersection drive within 35sq ft from their intersection. Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 section, (1163.03 A1 C), (1163.12 B). Cha.irman Gomersall called all interested parties forward, and reviewed the variances requested. Mr. Dubecky, with Budget Air Heating and Cooling and Mr. Santoro, with Special Effects Signs and Graphics came forward to present their proposal. Mr. Gomersall questioned Mr. Conway as to if the proposed sign was a pylon sign even though it was on a pole. Mr. Conway indicated "yes", and commented that the pole was below grade. Mr. Gomersall questioned if the proposed signage would be on the neighbor's property to the west. Mr. Conway commented that the triangle would have to be developed in relationship to the driveways and the right of ways and the driveway runs pretty close to their side of the property. Mr. Gomersall clarified that there would only be one sign. No further comments were made. J. Konold motioned to approve Jeff Dubecky of 30692 Lorain Road his request for variance (1123.12). Which consists of a sign Package and that the following variances be granted: 1) A variance to add a phone number to a pylon sign which is not pernutted by code, (1163.03 A 1 C). 2) A variance to have 3 services listed on a pylon sign, (code limits goods and services to 2), (1163.03 A 1 C). 3) A 5 foot 8 inch variance for side setback footage, (code requires 25ft, applicant shows 19ft 4"), (1163.12 B). 4) 2. 35square foot variances to construct pylon signs in 2 safety triangles, one being in their own and the second to be in their neighbor's to the west, (code stipulates No pylon signs shall be allowed within a triangle formed between points on the street right of way line and the nearest edge of an intersection drive within 35sq ft from their intersection. Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 section, (1163.03 A 1 C), (1163.12 B). The motion was seconded by W. Kremzar and unanimously approved. Variances Granted 10. Calvin & Lillie Brown: 24429 Woodside Dr.: Request for variance (1123.12). The proposal consists of adding a patio room to existing home. 6