07/01/1999 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

? , ., 1) A 1.6 foot variance for height of 72 feet of chain link fence (code permits 2.6ft high appl.icant requests 4ft high. Note: fence will run from the front of the house to the sidewallc. Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 section, (1135.02 F 4). The motion was seconded by W. Kremzar and unanunously approved. Variance Granted. 3. William Plichta; 30859 Windy Hollow Lane: Request for variance (1123.12). Proposal consists of a fence. The following variance is required: 1) A 2 foot height variance to install an 8 foot high fence (code allows 6ft, applicant request 8ft). Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 section, (1135.02 F1). Chairman Gomersall called all interested parties forward and reviewed the variance being requested. Mr. Plichta, and Mr. Latas, a concerned neighbor came forward. Mr. Gomersall indicated that the members had visited the site and understood why the request was made. He indicated that an 8 foot high fence was an unusual request but understood why it was needed. Mr. Kremzar asked if the neighbor present minded the fence being allowed. Mr. Latas indicated he had no objections to the fence being allowed. No further comments were made. W. Kremzar motioned to approve William Plichta of 30859 Windy Hollow Lane his request for variance (1123.12). Which consists of a fence and that the following variance be granted: 1) A 2 foot height variance to install an 8 foot high fence (code allows 6ft, applicant request 8ft). Which is ui violation of Ord. 90-125 section, (1135.02 F1). The motion was seconded by T. Koberna and unanimously approved. Variance Granted. 4. Les Lappe; 28702 Hollv Drive: Request for variance (1123.12). Proposal consists of an addition to the existing home. The following variance is requested: 1) An 18 foot rear yard setback variance (code requires SOft, applicant shows 32ft). Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 section, (1135.08 A). Chaiinian Gomersall called all interested parties forward and reviewed the variance being requested. Mr. & Mrs. Lappe came forward to present their proposal. Mr. Gomersall indicted he had no questions and asked if there tivere any questions from the other board members. Mr. Maloney indicated that he understood why the variance was being requested. He strongly suggested that the building department would need to make sure a firewall was put in place as the addition would be so close to the garage. Mr. Rymarczyk indicated that the building department would need additional drawings before the pernut would be issued. Mr. Gomersall questioned if the applicants knew what additional drawings were required. He suggested iVlr. Lappe contact the building department to find out what exactly would be needed. No further comments were made. ? J. Konold motioned to approve Les Lappe of 28702 Holly Drive his request for variance (1123.12). Which consists of an addition to the existing home and that the following variance be granted: 1) An 18 foot rear yard setback variance (code requires SOft, applicant shows 32ft). Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 section, (1135.08 A). The motion was seconded by W. Kremzar and unanunously approved. Variance Granted. 5. William Bratton: 23845 Mastick Road: , Request for variance (1123.12). Proposal consists of a shed. The following variance is requested: 1) A 40 square foot variance for exceeding the maximum square footage allowed (code pernuts 200sq ft, applicant request 240sq ft). Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 section, (1135.02 D1). 2