05/06/1999 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

f • (1135.02 C 3). 2. A 402sq ft variance for both detached garages total square footage, (Code permits 750sq ft, applicant requests 1172sq ft), (1135.02 C 1). Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 sections (1135.02 C 1& 3). The motion was seconded by, W. Kremzar and unanimously approved. Variance tGranted. 7. Famous Footwear; 26101 Great Northern Plaza North: Request for variance (1123.12). Proposal consists of a sign package. The following variance is required: 1. A 59 square foot variance for business unit signage, (Code permits SOsq ft, applicant requests 109sq ft), (1163.11 C ). 2. A 34 square foot variance for sign face area, (Code permits 75sq ft, applicant requests 109sq ft), ( 1163.12 A). Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 sections ( 1163.11 C) and (1163.12 A). Chairman Gomersall called all interested parties forward and reviewed the variances being requested. Mr. Krueger, with famous Footwear, and Mr. Bayaus with Allied lighting came forward to present their proposal. Mr. Bayaus suggested the sign was being replaced, due to the remodeling of Great Northern shopping center. Mr. Bayaus showed the board members pictures of the previous sign that was in place before the remodeling took place. He suggested the previous sign was 124sq ft total and we are only asking for 109sq ft for the new sign. He suagested because of the setback from Brookpark Road, and the loss of the canopy they needed the requested sign size. Mr. Gomersall commented that with the distance the store is from Brookpark Road he felt the sign size was warranted. The rest of the board members indicated they agreed with Mr. Gomersall. No further comments were made. W. Kremzar motioned to grant Famous Footwear of 26101 Great Northern Plaza North their request for variance (1123.12). Which consists of a sign package, and that the following variances be granted: 1. A 59 square foot variance for business unit signage, (Code permits SOsq ft, applicant requests 109sq ft), (1163.11 C ). 2. A 34 square foot variance for sign face area, (Code permits 75sq ft, applicant requests 109sq ft), ( 1163.12 A). Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 sections ( 1163.11 C) and (1163.12 A). The motion was seconded by, T. Koberna and unanimously approved. Variances Granted. 8. Charles Lehmann Sr.: 25238 Deerfield Drive: Request for variance (1123.12). Proposal consists of erecting a swimming pool. The following variance is required: A 4'foot variance for rear setback, (Code requires 10'ft rear yard setback, applicant shows 6'ft). Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 section, (1135.02 D 4, I). Note: Allowable lot coverage is not an issue. Chairman Gomersall called all interested parties forward and reviewed the variances being requested. Mr. Lehmann Sr. came forward to present his proposal. Mr. Gomersall reviewed that there was an existing 6'foot fence presently around the property. Mr. Lehmann indicated Mr. Gomersall was correct. Mrs. Sima came forward to be sworn in, she indicated she was a neighbor of Mr. Lehman and would like to know were the pool would be placed. Mr. Lehmann showed Mrs. Sima were the pool would be located. Mrs. Sima asked if there was an ordinance regarding how close a pool could be to a house. Mr. Rymarczyk indicated the code only 4