Laserfiche WebLink
CITY OF NORTH OLMSTED <br />"TOGE'I'HER WE CAN MAKE A DIFFRENCE" <br />BOA1tD OF ZONING APPEALS P <br />MINUTES - APRIL 1, 1999 <br />7:30PM <br />1. ROLL CALL: <br />Chairman Gomersall called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. <br />PRESENT: Chairman, R. Gomersall, Commissioners, T. Koberna, J. Konold, and W. Kremzar. <br />ALSO PRESENT: Building Commissioner, D. Conway, and Clerk of Commissions, D. Rote. <br />ABSENT: Commissioner, J. Maloney, and Law Director M. Gareau. <br />II. DISPOSTTION OF MINUTES: J. Konold moved to approve the March 4, 1999 minutes as written. The <br />motion was seconded by, W. Kremzar and unanimously approved. Motion Carried. <br />Chairman Gomersall advised that each case would be judged on the physical situation peculiar to <br />itself, so that in no way is a judgment rendered considered to be a general policy judgment affecting <br />properties and like situations elsewhere. <br />Retail Today Lot Split: <br />Request for variance (1123.12). Proposal consists of a proposed lot split. <br />The following variances are requested: <br />1) A 14' foot variance for rear yard setback (Code requires 25'foot setback). <br />2) A 10'foot variance for rear yard parking/drive setback (Code requires 10'foot). <br />Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125, section (1139.07). Note: This case was heard by the Planuing <br />Commission on 2/23/99, at which time the Commission approved Retail Today's lot split contingent upon <br />variances being approved. <br />Chairman Gomersall called all interested parties forward, and reviewed the variances requested. Mr. <br />Wagner VP of operations, came forward to present the proposal. Mr. Wagner reviewed that the building <br />behind the CVS pharmacy store had been removed. The owners of the property would like to divide the <br />parcel in question into two parcels. The first variance is for a rear yard setback, which is for, parcel A. The <br />reason for the variance is due to the drive through canopy on the CVS pharmacy building. Mr. Kremzar <br />questioned if the canopy would be directly on the property line. Mr. Wagner indicated the canopy would be <br />11'feet from the property line therefore a 14'foot rear yard setback variance would be needed. Mr. Wagner <br />reviewed the 10'foot rear yard-parking setback requested. He indicated both variances, which are needed, <br />would be for the parcel in which CVS pharmacy is located. Furthermore the new proposed lot would not <br />require any variances. Mr. Kremzar asked if the eYisting ground sign would be shared with the tenant of the <br />new parcel. Mr. Wagner indicated Mr. Kremzar was correct. Mr. Koberna asked if the new parcel would <br />be developed in the future. Mr. Wagner indicated that parcel B would be developed once the lot is sold and <br />a new tenant develops the land. Mrs. Bowman a concerned neighbor came forward to be sworn in. Mrs. <br />Bowman asked to review the variances that were being requested. Mr. Wagner reviewed the variances and <br />why they were needed. <br />J. Konold motioned to approve Retail Today Lot Split their Request for variance (1123.12), and that the <br />following variances are granted: <br />1) A 14' foot variance for rear yard setback (Code requires 25'foot setback). <br />2) A 10'foot variance for rear yard parking/drive setback (Code requires 10'foot). <br />Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125, section (1139.07). The motion was seconded by W. Kremzar and <br />unanimously approved. Variances Granted. <br />2. Ronald & Donna Glassco: 6136 Croton Drive: <br />Request for variance (1123.12). Proposal consists of a 7'ft. 6"inch X 10'ft metal shed. <br />The following variance is requested: <br />A variance allowing a permit to be issued for a shed in a side yard (code allows detached accessory storage- <br />building only in rear yard).