04/01/1999 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Which is in Violation of Ord. 90-125, Section (1135.02 d-1). Note: The 7'ft. 6"inch X 10'ft. Metal shed is Y-currently in side yard. Chairman Gomersall called all interested parties forward, and reviewed the variance requested. 1VIr. & Mrs. Glassco, the applicants came forward to present their proposal. Mr. Koberna asked if there had been a shed in the same location prior to the shed that Mr. Glassco erected. 1VIr. Glassco indicated there had been a shed in the same place, which was deteriorating. He was not aware that he needed a permit as he was just replacing the dilapidated shed with a new shed. Mr. Gomersall suggested when he viewed the site it was well hidden, but in the future Mr. Glassco should check with the building department to avoid being sited. Mr. 0'Mally an abutting neighbor suggested he didn't have a problem with the shed and indicated he sent a letter that indicated he would like to see Mr. Glassco be able to keep the shed. 7. Konold motioned to approve Ronald & Donna Glassco of 6136 Croton Drive their request for variance (1123.12), and that the following variance be granted: A variance allowing a permit to be issued for a shed in a side yard (code allows detached accessory storage building only in rear yard). Which is in Violation of Ord. 90-125, Section (1135.02 d-1). Note: The 7'ft. 6"inch X 10'ft. Metal shed is currently in side yard. The motion was seconded by T. Koberna and unanimously approved. Variance for Permit Granted. Conrad's Total Car Care: 4799 Great Northern Blvd.: Request for variance (1123.12). Proposal consists of a sign package. The following variances are requested: 1) A 200 square foot variance for building use signage (Code pernuts 114sq ft. they request 314sq ft, (1163.11 A). 2) A 160 square foot variance for business use signage (Code permits 154sq ft. they request 314sq ft, (1163.11 A). 3) A variance to insta113 wall signs (Code permits 1 they request 3, (1163.12 A). 4) A 37 square foot variance of signage for wall sign #l, ( Code permits 75sq ft. they request 112sq ft, (1163.12 A). 5) A 100 square-foot variance of signage for wall sign #2, (Code permits 75sq ft. they request 175sq ft, (1163.12 A). Note: They are appealing, the decision of the building commissioners regarding logo's and verbiage. Which is in Violation of Ord. 90-125, Section (1163.11 A, and 1163.12 A). Chairman Gomersall called all interested parties forward, and reviewed the variances requested. Mr. Schramm of Schramm signs, and Mr. Umek, the General manager for Conrad's came forward to present their proposal. Mr. Gomersall asked if the signs in question were new. Mr. Schramm suggested they would just be replacing the eYisting signage. Mr. Conway suggested the size of the proposed signage is almost double what is presently there. Mr. Gomersall asked Mr. Conway to review the signage for him. Mr. Conway indicated they presently have 145 square feet now and asking for 314 square feet. Mr. Schramm suggested it would be 28" inches by 4'foot if you make a complete box around the sign, which is on the front of the building. Mr. Gomersall suggested the signage is being doubled. Mr. Umek suggested they needed the signage for the new company. Mr. Schramm suggested the size was incorrect because the way the code is written a box is placed around the letters and only one letter is 36" inches the others are 24"inch letters. Mr. Conway suggested Mr. Schramin was trying to justify the size and what needed to be discussed is the signage being asked for. The applicants have gone from a signal name to Conrad's Total Car Care. Mr. Umek suggested the elevations were such that the size requested, would be required to be seen from the main road. Mr. Gomersall asked why 4'foot letters were needed. Mr. Schramm suggested all the letters are 2'foot letters except one, which is 3'foot, it is because of the box that has to be placed around the total sign. Mr. Kremzar asked if the sign on the doors were really needed. Mr. Umek suggested the identity on the door was not as important as the signs on the mansard. Mr. Gomersall indicated the applicants are requesting 175 square feet for the southem East End. Mr. Conway asked if the checkered flags were needed. Mr. Umek suggested it was their logo. The need for the signage is due to letting the public know that they are a complete car care faciiity not just a tire store. Mr. Schramm suggested the sizes of the flags are 4' feet. He suggested the logos are needed because the size of the building is such that the sign gets lost, so the logos are used to balance the look. Mr. Umek indicated a pole sign has been removed and no ground sign will be used. Mr. Gomersall asked if the applicants were indicating they would be happy with two wall signs. Mr. 2