09/07/2000 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

. ti . • Chairman, Maloney called all interested parties forward to review the request. The oath was administered to Len Javor, the owner who came forward to review the request. Mr. 7avor indicated that he talked with neighbors and they recommended he go to the City and get the variance. After the letters were sent out the rear neighbors called Mr. Javor and approved his dimensions that he came up with for the shed. He did not realize that there was a drainage easement in the back. Seeing that the shed has not been built yet, Mr. Javor indicated that he would have no problem with making it 5 foot from the back. His main concern was there is a yard drain on that side and the land slopes toward the drain and he wanted to be able to put it on level land without seriously having to re-contour the land. Mr. Maloney questioned if he would be better off moving it in 5 feet from the side and 5 feet from the rear that way he avoids the drainage and also the side yard variance. Mr. 7avor indicated he could but he was trying to line it up with the shed located behind his home. Mr. Gareau indicated that Mr; Javor had to work around the easement, it is his property but he is not to infi-inge or block the water flowage to the storm sewer in any way. W. Kremzar motioned to approve Leonard and Jean Javor of 25152 Tara Lynn Dr. his request for variance (1123.12). Which consists of installing a shed and that the following variances be granted as amended: . 1) A 48 square foot variance for maximum square footage for a shed (code perrriits 72 sq. ft, applicant shows 120 sq. ft), section (1135.02 (D) (1)). 2) An 5 foot variance for rear yard setback (code requires 10 ft, applicant shows 5 ft), section (1135.02 (D) (4))• ; 3) A 2 foot variance for side yard setback (code requires 5 ft, applicant shows 3 ft), section (1135.02 (D) (4)). Which is,in violation of Ord. 90-125 section, 1135.02 D 1, and 1135.02 D 4. The motion was seconded by, J. Konold and unanimously approved. Variances Granted. 10. Jov Gunnett• 4078 Winton Park Request for variance (1123.12). The proposal consists of erecting a 6 foot high fence. The following variances are requested: 1) A 42 inch variance for height of 58 foot fence in rear neighbors front setback (code permits 30 inches, applicant shows 72 inches), section (1135.02 (F) (2)). 2) A 58 foot variance for fence over 50% closed (code permits under 50% open, applicant shows over 50% closed), section (1135.02 (F) (1)).- Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 section, 1135.02 F 2, and 1135.02 F 1. Chairman, Maloney called all interested parties forward and reviewed the request. The oath was administered to Joy:Gunnett, the owner who came forward to review the proposal. Ms. Gunnett commented that she vvould like to change one of the variance requests from a 6 foot board on , board fence to a 5 foot picket fence to match the back picket. Mr. Maloney commented that in item number 2 she would not need the variance for 50% closed. Mr. Rymarczyk commented that the picket fence would still need to be 50% open. Ms. Gunnett remarked that the: entire fence will be 5 feet high. Mr. Rymaxczyk commented that item number 1 would become a 30 inch high variance instead of 42 inch. J. Maloney motioned to approve Joy Gunnett of 4078 Winton Park her request for variance (1123.12) as amended. Which consists of erecting a 5 foot high f variances be granted: ence and that the following 1) A 30 inch variance for height of 58 foot length fence in rear neighbors front setback (code 6