Laserfiche WebLink
r <br />that it could be placed under the proposed street. Mr. Hreha strongly felt that the small street did <br />not constitute a street nor meet the requirements of a street. It was determined that the Law <br />Department would look into whether or not the proposed side street met city requirements. Mr. <br />Gibble reviewed were he lived and questioned if the retention system would cross onto his land. <br />He indicated that there is only 22-inch piping were they will be dumping the water from the <br />retention system. The current pipes will not be able to handle the added pressure. The current <br />lot floods now and the development of this lot will only cause more water problems. W. Tallon <br />indicated that the developer would have to develop the land to the requirements of the City of <br />North Olmsted not Olmsted Falls. They will be required by North Olmsted codes to retain the <br />water on their own land and will not be allowed to runoff onto the neighboring properties. Mr. <br />Gibble sugaested that the area of the proposed lake is currently were a creak is now. He <br />questioned were the runoff water will go. Mr. Deichmann indicated that the retention <br />requirement is to hold the water either underground or above ground and then release it to an <br />existing pipe at the current rate that flows now. They will have to maintain the water on the land <br />and can only release the water at a speed that the pipes currently handle. W. Gibble questioned <br />what type of pipes the retention system would be made of. Mr. Deichmann suggested it would <br />be corrugated pipe. Mr. Gibble indicated that the ditch is only a few feet high and questioned <br />how it would keep from over flowing. W. Tallon reiterated that the developer has to maintain <br />the water runoff to a rate that it currently is today. Mr. Conic, a neighbor of Mr. Gibble <br />questioned if the developer designed the retention system to handle the water currently on the <br />land or the amount of water that drains onto the land. Mr. Zwick suggested that his calculations <br />included the water that comes onto the property. IVIr. Conic questioned what size of pipe is at the <br />outlet. W. Zwick indicated that it would be a 30-inch pipe. Mr. C"ribble indicate that the current <br />pipe is only 22inches now and will not be able to handle the 30inch pipe. Mr. Zwick suggested <br />the neighbors needed bigger pipes. Mr. Gibble suggested that 30 years ago when he installed the <br />pipes the size was fine. Mr. Conic questioned if there would be water maintained in the lake in <br />the dry months. He further questioned whether the proposed lake would handle a 100-year <br />rainfall. Mr. Zwick suggested that there would be water in the lake at all times and would be <br />able to handle a 100-year rain. Mr. Cornic indicated that the pipes on Cook Road currently block <br />up and backs up which will be the developer problem as well as theirs. Mr. TalIon commented <br />that if this is approved the applicant can not release water any quicker then what is all ready <br />moving now. Mr. Hreha questioned if the pipe W. Gibble's was suggesting backs.up was <br />currently on his property. Mr. Gibble indicated that the pipe ran right across his driveway and <br />along Cook Road. Mr. Gibble indicated that currently there is not a water problem, but believes <br />the development will cause one. W. Tallon repeated that if the water level increases it witl have <br />to be retained on the land until it can be released at a rate that currently runs now. Mr. Cornic <br />questioned were the silk runoff would go. W. Zwick reviewed that the large lake will allow the <br />silk to settle. Mr. Cornic questioned if the engineering plans would be available for review once <br />submitted. Mr. Tallon indicated that all documents submitted are available for review. Mr. <br />Cornic questioned when the homeowners would be responsible for maintaining the lake. Mr. <br />Zwick indicated that while the site is being developed Hennie home will maintain the lake. <br />Then once the development is completed the association will maintain the lake. Mr. Tallon <br />questioned if Hennie Homes in fact would be responsible for the lake until the development was <br />100% complete. Mr. Zwick believed that that was correct but not sure. Mr. Tallon indicated that <br />the commission would make it part or the approval that Hennie homes will maintain the site until <br />it is 100% developed. Beth from Hennie Homes suggested that they would maintain the area <br />5