10/24/2000 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

until the development was 70% completed. Mr. Tallon strongly suggested that Hennie homes retain responsibility for the lake until the site is 100% developed. The city does not want to get into a situation were the association can not take care of the land and then the city of North Olmsted ends up with the burden of taking care of the lake. Mr. Cornic questioned if the association would have insurance incase someone is hurt. Mr. Zwick indicated that the deepest part of the pond will be a maximum of 8 feet deep. Mr. Cornic questioned what type of wall would be in the lake. Mr. Zwick reviewed that there would be a fountain in the lake so that it is aerated, the walls will be natural and it will be fenced for safety. Mr. Cornic questioned if the homes would have a sump pump in the basements. He further questioned if there would be drains in the rear of the yards. Mr. Zwick indicated that there would be a sump pump in the basements and drains in the rear of each yard. Mr. Tallon indicated that the City of North Olmsted requires underground water retention systems and this is above ground so most of your questions pertain to an above ground which we do not normally allow. Mr. Deichmann reviewed that the developer is trying to maintain the trees but to accommodate drainage that might not be possible. Mr. Cornic suggested that the proposed small road dead-ended into a light industry zoned property. Mr. Zwick suggested that the purpose of the stub road was for future development. Mr. Deichmann suggested that if the street abuts an industrial land the city may have to barricade the street to make sure it is not used as a cut through. Mr. Dubelko indicated that the City of North Olmsted could have control over the traffic on the street. Mr. Zwick suggested that the developer could assist the city if that is the case by dedicating a piece of land to the City so they could keep trucks off the street. Mr. Hreha suggested shortening the street and developing a small park at the end of the street. Mr. Tallon commented that the board would need to receive the Law Departments report first. Mr. Cornic questioned if the city knew that there were wetlands on the rear land. Mr. Zwick indicated that there is no wetlands in the land to be developed. Mr. Tallon questioned if Block B had wetlands. Mr. Zwick indicated there was indeed wetlands on Block B. Mr. Asseff questioned what the average square footage of the homes would be. Ms. Beth indicated that the square footage presently would be more than 11,000 square feet but nothing has been cast in stone at this time. Mr. Tallon motioned to table Cinnamon Lake Subdivision, Preliminary Plat until meeting next. The proposal is to subdivide permanent parcel No. 264-07-025 (recently annexed), located south of Cook Road and east of Bronson Road, into forty four (44) B-Residential sublot's and two (2) Remnant blocks. Note that Re-Zoning (item No.2, this agenda) is required. The Law department will look into the requirement of the 500-foot setback of a cul-de-sac. The feasibility of an underground retention system will be addressed. The commission would like the safety department to look at the proposed site. The commission would like their comments on the one water line issue. The forester is to look into the feasibility of saving the trees and at the same time realizing that the drainage has to be maintained. The Law Department will also look into Block B, which will create a non-build-able lot as there is no frontage. The rezoning issue wi11 be addressed after the other issues are addressed. Therefore, issue 2 will be tabled as well. The motion was seconded by S. Asseff and unanimously approved. Motion Carried. 2. Cinnamon Lake SubdivisionRezoning Request The proposal is to Re-Zone permanent parcel No. 264-07-025, located south off Cook Road and east of Bronson Road, to B-Residence, Single entirely, to accommodate the proposed subdivision (as noted in item 1, this agenda). 6