Laserfiche WebLink
. ? ? <br />I? <br />Planning Commission last year and they recommended it be denied. Therefore, the Planning <br />Commission is on record of being against the rezoning of the two lots in question. Making a <br />motion against the rezoning of the two-(2) lots would be a reaffirmation of that. Mr. Conway <br />indicated that his review for compliance to the zoning Code was predicated on the lots being <br />rezoned. Therefore, if they are not rezoned then there is no place for storage of vehicles. <br />Therefore, they would not comply with the Code, so he is not sure how that affects their motion <br />as it goes forward. Mr. Dubelko suggested that, that would be a problem if Mr. Conway was <br />saying that if they do not have the parking on sublot's 24 and 25 then the proposal with respect <br />to parking does not meet the City Codes. Mr. Conway commented that was what he was <br />saying. Mr. Dubelko indicated Mr. Conway's statement is a valuable one. 1VIr. Conway <br />questioned how that would affect the applicant's proposal as they move forward. Mr. Dubelko <br />suggested that should be looked into. <br />R. Tallon motioned to approve Halleen KIA of 27726 Lorain Rd. their proposal which consists <br />of the demolition of 2 existing buildings and the construction of a new car sales building with <br />the following recommend changes. 1). The two (2) C pole lights on sublot 25 are to be <br />removed. 2). The B pole light on the north side of the proposed curb cut is to be removed. 3). <br />The two (2) A pole lights on Dewy Road are to be removed. 4). The proposed curb cut on <br />Dewy is to be eliminated. 5). The pole lights along Lorain Road are to be reduced to a 15-foot <br />height with a maximum of 400-watt bulbs. 6). The interior pole lights near the residential lots <br />are to be reduced to 10 feet with no more than 250-watt light bullis. 7). The renovations of the <br />two-(2) existing buildings are to be more than just repainting. . The buildings should match the <br />exterior materials of the new building. 8). The mounding on Dewy Road will start directly <br />across from the first residential lot line and continue down Dewy Road. 9). On the mounding <br />there is to be an inter woven fencing which will off set the gaps from the trees and landscaping. <br />10). Parking cars on sublot's 24 and 25 is to be eliminated. 11). Sublot 24 and 25 are to remain <br />green space and remain zoned as presently is. The motion was seconded by, T. Hreha, roll call <br />on the motion; R. Tallon, K. O'Rourke, R. Koeth, T. Hreha, S. Asseff and W. Spalding; Yes, C. <br />Allan; No. Motiorn Carried. <br />R. Tallon motioned to reaffirm that the Planning Commission is against the rezoning of sublot's <br />24 and 25. The motion. was seconded by, W. Spalding and unanimously approved. IVIotion <br />Carried. <br />2. R7R Building,; 4858 Dover Center Rd. <br />Proposal consists of exterior alterations to existing converted residence structure for office use. <br />Chairman Ta11on called all interested parties forward to review the proposal. Mr. Porter, the <br />architect came forward to review the RJR Building. Mr. Porter presented pictures of the <br />existing building for the board to review: He suggested that the project was a bit of a quandary. <br />A two-(2) phase project needs the board's approval. - The house was rezoned for commercial <br />use and as soon as it was rezoned, the building violated all the restrictions in the Zoning <br />Codebook for a commercial property. The first phase would be to put in a parking space, a <br />handy cap ramp and close the front entry. They would like to have a masonry wall with a <br />concrete ramp behind the wall. The ramp would be placed across the front of the building. The <br />second phase will be an expansion to the rear of the building with an entrance just to the right of <br />the walled up garage. There will be a window where the existing entrance is currently and a <br />4