09/12/2000 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

? window in the walled up garage area. The existing brick is a concrete masonry unit, which is no longer manufactured. The handy cap ramp will be a red masonry brick which they will try to match the existing brick color as close as they can. The first phase currently requires a variance for a sidewalk encroaching within 10 feet of the property line, which they will modify to bring into Code eliminating the need for the variance. The second renovations will require a special petmit to add to a non-conforming building. The second phase will require two (2) variances, due to the property being rezoned. A parking variance and a front setback for parking variance is required. Mr. Tallon questioned Mr. Conway about the variances required. Mr. Conway suggested that the applicant indicated that they would move the handy cap ramp to eliminate the phase one variance needed. The project will require a special permit to add to a non- conforming building. Phase 2 addition requires two (2) variances for the additional parking that will be required. Mr. Tallon questioned if the lot would be over burdened and inquired about the percentage of land being used. Mr. Conway indicated that he was not sure but believed they were not over the 20%. Mr. Tallon questioned what type of business would the building house. Mr. Porter suggested there would only be offices in the building. The parking requirements would not allow anything more than offices. Mr. Tallon questioned if 11 parking spaces would - be enough for the building. Mr. Porter suggested that one parking space would need a variance. Mr. Koeth questioned how many trees would be removed. Mr. Porter indicated that the site plan showed one tree would be removed in phase one (1): Mr. Koeth indicated that in phase two (2) the plans show two (2) trees being removed. He would like to have the forester give his recommendations on the lot. Mr. Tallon questioned where the doors would be located. Mr. Porter reviewed where the doors would be located and how they would be used. Mr. Koeth questioned if the basement would be used. Mr. Porter suggested that by Code the basement could not be use as there is no egress. In phase two (2) the basement will have an egress but will still not meet the Ohio Codes for use.. Mr. Spalding questioned the landscape drawing. Mr. Porter indicated that the bushes along the West Side of the property would have euonymus bushes all along the property line to buffer the church. Mr. Spalding questioned the lighting. Mr. Porter indicated that the lighting would be gas type lampposts. R. Tallon motion to send RJR Building of 4858 Dover Center Rd. to the Board of Zoning Appeals. The Planning Commission recommends that the Board of Zoning Appeals approves the phase two's variance requests: A 10 foot parking variance. A 40-foot variance for the structure and a 4-foot parking variance for phase two (2). The motion was seconded by, Mr. Koeth and unanimously approved. Motion Carried. R. Tallon motion to approve RJR Building of 4858 Dover Center Rd phase one (1) parking facility in the front of the building along with the front elevation changes. The motion was seconded by, W. Spalding and unanimously approved. Motion Carried. 3. Econo Lodge Cleveland Airport West; 22989 Lorain Rd. Proposal consists of construction of a new building for the housing of a swimming pool. Chairman Tallon called all interested parties forward to review their proposal. Mr. Petroski the lodge's representative, came forward to review the proposal. Mr. Petroski used a motel model that was.made in 1996 to show were the new addition would be placed and were the three (3) parking spaces would be relocated. The addition will house a sma11 pool with a depth of not 5