Laserfiche WebLink
Dubelko indicated that the I.aw Department should look at this first. Then the Law <br />Department would advise the Planning Commission at the next meeting. N1r. Tallon <br />questioned what the dish would be receiving. Mr. Wanamaker indicated it would be <br />receiving telephone signals. Data that is transferred by microwave rather than using <br />hard-line. Mr. Tallon questioned if the signals would be moving from building to <br />building. Mr. Wanamaker replied "yes." Mr. Conway indicated that the applicants <br />would obtain permits to install the system in the general retail area and use landlines to <br />make the connection. Then they would wait until they received approval for the <br />antennas, then eliminate the landline and use the microwave antenna. W. Koeth <br />questioned if what the applicants were proposing was to add antennas to the Westbury. <br />Mr. Conway indicated that the applicants would be taking a bedroom in one of the suite <br />where cellular technology is not being stored and mount their own equipment. Then the <br />applicants antenna would microwave to Garfield Heights. Mr. Tallon indicated that this <br />is where the problems began last time, by encroaching on residential areas of the <br />building. Mr. Wanamaker indicated that in the Westbury, they would be located on the <br />19'1' floor. Mr. Tallon indicated he is concerned with what would be next if this proposal <br />is approved. Mr. Wanamaker indicated that the applicants used to use an 18- inch <br />antenna and then something happened where a different frequency had to be used and <br />they had to go to a 24-inch antenna. He indicated that the competitors have been known <br />for using 12-inch antennas. Mr. Tallon indicated that he agrees with Mr. Dubelko <br />having numerous unanswered questions. Mr. Conway indicated that he has no objection <br />with referring this to the Law Department. Mr. Dubelko indicated the Law Department <br />would need more technical information rather than a promotional brochure. W. Koeth <br />recommended that an actual representative from Teligent should be present at the next <br />meeting. No further comments were made. <br />Mr. Tallon motioned to table the proposals of (1) Westbury Apartments; 25151 <br />Brookpark Rd._which consists of determination of use classification for proposed wireless <br />telephone collection facility, (2) Community Building; 26777 Lorain Rd. which consists <br />of determination of use classification for proposed wireless telephone collection facility, <br />and, (3) Corporate Center One; 25000 Country Club Blvd. which consists of <br />determination of use classification for proposed wireless telephone collection facility <br />until the Planning Commission meeting of June 27, 2000. Also that the technical <br />information be submitted to the Law Department for review as soon as possible. The <br />motion went as follows: all in favor were R. Tallon, K. O'Rourke, W. Spalding, C. Allan, <br />and B. Koeth with T. Hreha abstaining due to a conflict of interest as he works for <br />Ameritech, and this would be a direct competitor. Propmsal Tableci. <br />2. Moen Corporate World Headquarters: of AL Moen Drive PP# 236-11-009,011,018 & <br />23 6-12-010: <br />Proposal consists of additional parking. <br />Chairman Tallon called all interested parties forward to review the proposal. Mr. Cocco, <br />from Clark and Post Architects for Moen, came forward to review the proposal. He <br />reviewed that Moen recently acquired 5 acres of property to the South of them that wraps <br />around the cul-de-sac that ends Al Moen Drive. He indicated that this is in preparation to