My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05/23/2000 Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Boards and Commissions
>
2000
>
2000 Planning Commission
>
05/23/2000 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2019 12:48:21 PM
Creation date
1/28/2019 4:23:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
N Olmsted Boards & Commissions
Year
2000
Board Name
Planning Commission
Document Name
Minutes
Date
5/23/2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
through 1940 Fords or Chevy's, with complete fiberglass bodies, new chassis, new brake systems, <br />and new engines, etc. Mr. Asseff questioned if there would be a noticeable amount of deliveries <br />causing an increase in traffic. Mr. Rego indicated that he does not anticipate a delivery a day and <br />he believes the traffic would be quite less than what the previous occupant. Mr. Scanlon indicated <br />that they are not aware of the business that was previously operated. He reviewed that there <br />would only be a staff with less than 10 people with only 16 chassis's delivered in a year, which is <br />the largest delivery: He indicated that the rest of the deliveries would be small parts. Mr. Rego <br />indicated that there would be a showroom, and in that showroom there would be brand new <br />engines and parts in which the customers would come in and choose each part for the automobile <br />he would like built. Then the staff would take the parts to the rear of the building and assemble <br />and paint the car in three months. Mr. Case, former owner of Stylus Concepts for 8 years, came <br />forward and indicated that his staff performed similar uses, building custom pick-up trucks. They <br />then did a spin-off from that and turned the business into an international order business. Mr. Case <br />indicated that there were some semi truck deliveries, but not 12. He indicated there were about <br />3-4 semi deliveries a day, bringing in about 10 million in sales accessories a year. He indicated his <br />business is similar to what Mr. Rego is proposing, but the truck flow would be much less than <br />when he owned the building, so the noise level would be considerably less. He also indicated that <br />he greatly improved the site from the bar that was there previously. Mr. Case believes Mr. Rego <br />will be a great asset to the community and asks the board to seriously consider the proposal. <br />Mr. Tallon questioned if Mr. Case indicated he had been building pick-up trucks at the facility <br />before. Mr. Tallon indicated that Mr. Case had been working in violation of the City Ordinance <br />because it was never approved by Planning Commission to allow truck to be built; he was <br />working illegally. Mr. Case indicated that it was no secret as to what business he was running <br />previously. Mr. Tallon indicated that it was to the Planning Commission and that Board is the <br />one that would have to have given him permission. Mr. Case indicated that the business was the <br />sale of sport truck accessories. Mr. Tallon indicated it was for sport truck accessories only, not <br />for building trucks. Mr. Case reiterated that there were trucks being assembled as well. Mr. <br />Tallon indicated that Mr. Case had been working illegally then. Mr. Case indicated that the <br />despite what was legal and illegal, all Mr. Rego is proposing is building 16-18 automobiles a year. <br />He indicated that the business was very stand-up and the property was well maintained. Mr. Case <br />indicated that Mr. Rego would be dealing with people with discretionary incomes, people who <br />want to buy custom classic street rods. He reiterated that Mr. Rego would be an asset to the <br />community. Mr. Tallon questioned if Mr. Case still owned the property. Mr. Case replied yes, <br />he still owns the buildings. Mr. Asseff questioned Mr. Rymarczyk on what sort of permits are <br />required to be painting indoors as far as emissions from Building; do they have to incinerate all the <br />fumes and how does that work. Mr. Rymarczyk responded that the EPA would regulate it. He <br />indicated that the Building Department would be looking at the fire suppression system and the <br />exhaust and the electrical, but he is not aware of EPA requirements. Mr. Rymarczyk indicated <br />that they would need some sort of verification from the applicant showing approval from the <br />EPA. Mr. Richie came forward to reiterate that the Ohio EPA requires a pernut if a business is <br />omitted more than 10 pounds of VOC's, which is volatile organic compounds per day. He <br />indicated that he deals with the EPA on a daily basis and they do not require a permit because the <br />usage is under the 10-pound usage. Mr'. Richie indicated that W. Rego would be established <br />under a Diminmus Rule in which he would have to track on a daily basis the amount of emissions <br />that he is expelling from his exhaust stack. He indicated that he has been in the business for <br />4
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.