Laserfiche WebLink
Z. Rosewood Estates Subdivision Number 6 PreliminM Plan - NOTE: That this proposal is <br />related to the above agenda item number 1 and involves both cities of Westlake and North <br />Olmsted. North Olmsted Item: The proposal is to construct a dedicated street through <br />permanent parcel number 231-19-017 intersecting Columbia Road and providing access to a <br />proposed seven (7) sublot subdivision in Westlake. Current zoning within North Olmsted is <br />B-Residence, Single Entirely. <br />Mr. Tallon called all interested parties forward to review the request. He then suggested <br />tabling the proposals since no representatives were present. He indicated that since the <br />residences were in attendance that their comments and concerns would be noted if they <br />wished to coine forward even though the proposals would be tabled. Mr. Bohlmann, Service <br />Department Director for City of North Olmsted indicated that the street would be in North <br />Olmsted and the housing in Westlake and he did not think it would be conducive to <br />maintenance of the street. He is concerned with who would be responsible for the <br />maintenance of the street. Mr. Bohlmann suggested annexing the land into North Olmsted, so <br />as to not have the street in one city and the homes in another. He indicated similar streets <br />throughout the City where this has not worked out. Ms. Oldenburg, Ms. Ball, and Mr. <br />Ammons, neighbors, came forward with the same concerns of water drainage, construction, <br />who would be responsible for the tree lines on their properties if the trees became damaged <br />due to this construction, would there be fencing for the properties abutting the new housing, <br />and is it really in the best interest of the traffic congestion that is already prominent. <br />Mr. Tallon motioned to table the proposals of Root Road vacation and Lehlbach Lot Split and <br />Assembly Plat and Rosewood Estates Subdivision Number 6, Preliminary Plan until the May <br />23, 2000 meeting since there were no representatives present. The motion was seconded by <br />W. Spalding and unanimously approved. Motion Carried. <br />IV. COMNI[JNICATIONS: <br />V. CONIlVIITTEE REPORTS: <br />VI. MINOR CHANGES: <br />VIII. NEW BUSINESS: <br />IX. OLD BUSINESS: <br />X. ADJOURNMENT: <br /> The meeting was adjourned at 8:30pm. <br />4