My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08/17/2000 Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Boards and Commissions
>
2000
>
2000 Board of Building Code Appeals
>
08/17/2000 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2019 12:48:25 PM
Creation date
1/28/2019 4:31:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
N Olmsted Boards & Commissions
Year
2000
Board Name
Board of Building Code Appeals
Document Name
Minutes
Date
8/17/2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Commissioner about the board members going to the neighbor's home to talk <br />to her. Mr. Rymarczyk indicated that it would be up to the board. Mr. <br />Engoglia suggested that the issue be tabled and that the board members talk to <br />the neighbor. The board members do not want to be unreasonable but it would <br />not work having two fences side by side. Mr. Puzzitiello suggested using <br />landscaping along the property line for privacy. Mrs. Myers commented that <br />she did not feel that she was being treated fairly. Mr. Engoglia again offered to <br />speak with the neighbor. Mrs. Myers remarked that she spoke to her and she <br />does not want the fence removed. She does not want to see the neighbor <br />pressured. Mr. Puzzitiello again suggested landscaping. Mrs. Myers voiced <br />her frustration and left the meeting. The board members commented that they <br />could not allow two fences side by side. <br />P. Engoglia motioned to deny Lelia A. Myers of 4525 Gladland Ave. <br />her request for a variance to place a second fence along the north side of the <br />her property, (code does not allow additional fence if there is existing fence on <br />property line). Which is in violation of section 1369.03 (a) .(3). The motion <br />was seconded by R. Klesta and unanimously approved. Variance Denied. <br />IV. CONIMUNICATIONS: <br />V. ' COMMITTEE REPORTS: <br />VI. NEW BUSINESS: <br />VII. OLD BUSINESS: <br />VIII. ADJOURNMENT: <br />. P. Engoglia motioned to adjourn the meeting and excuse the absents of board <br />members, M. Conway, and D. Spoerke. The motion was seconded by R. <br />Puzzitiello and unanimously approved. Meeting adjourned at 5:45pm. <br />R. <br />Clerk of Commissions, D. Rote
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.