My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11/27/2001 Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Boards and Commissions
>
2001
>
2001 Board of Building Code Appeals
>
11/27/2001 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2019 12:48:31 PM
Creation date
1/28/2019 4:52:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
N Olmsted Boards & Commissions
Year
2001
Board Name
Board of Building Code Appeals
Document Name
Minutes
Date
11/27/2001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
r_ <br />CITY OF NORTH OLMSTED <br />"TOGETHER WE CAN MAKE A DIFFERENCE" <br />BOARD OF SUII.DING CODE APPEALS <br />MIlNUTES NOVEMBER 27, 2001 <br />AT 5:30 PM <br />IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS <br />I. ROLL CALL: <br />Chairman, Puzzitiello called the meeting to order at 5:40 p.m. <br />PRESENT: Chairman, R. Puzzitiello, Board members; R. Klesta, P. Engolia and N. Althen. <br />ALSO PRESENT: Asst. Clerk of Commissions, S. Solomon; Asst. Law Director, J. <br />Dubelko; Building Inspectors, T. Rymarczyk, and L. Cifranic. <br />ABSENT: Board member; M. Conway. <br />II. REVIEW AND CORRECTION OF MINUTES: <br />III. BUILDING DEPARTMENT REQUESTS: <br />1VIs Hanne Boger; Rasmussen Homes <br />Proposal consists of a request to revoke contractors registration in the City of North <br />Olmsted in accordance with section 1317.07. Note: This case was tabled at the November <br />20, 2001 Board of Building Code Appeals meeting. <br />Chairman Puzzitiello called Ms. Boger forward along with the homeowners, Mr. & Mrs. <br />Busony, who were having their home built by 1Vys. Boger's company. Mr. Klesta <br />questioned if Ms. Boger's son who was doing the actual work was present. Ms. Boger <br />indicated that he could not be here because he is out of towri. Mr. Puzzitiello questioned <br />who Sam Riolo is. Ms. Boger replied that Sam Riolo was a ma,son that they had offered to <br />hire to take care of all the problems. The building depa.rtment had asked her to bring in <br />someone independent of her company. There was a m'ix up with Sam Riolo who does their <br />work atid his father wfio is an excavator in Olmsted Township. The Boger's attorney told <br />her that he wasn't acceptable to do the'work, so they halted all operations at the site. Mr. <br />Puzzitiello questioned if her company was a corporation. Ms. Boger replied that they were <br />a corporation. W. Puzzitiello questioned if they were general contractors. Ms. Boger <br />indicated that they are module homebuilders. They have all subcontractors that they work <br />. with. W. Klesta indicatecl that they are the general contractors then. You line up all of the <br />sub trades, and everybody who works on that site to take care of the different stages, you <br />take care of that for the"homeowners. Ms. Boger replied yes, for this particular situation. <br />1V1r. Engolia questioned.who did the brickwork at the site in question. Ms. Boger replied <br />that a company out of Port Clinton, Malorey Constr-uction, poured the_ footer and did the <br />brickwork. Mr. Engolia questioned if they had the foundation plan at this property. Ms. <br />Boger replied yes. All of their plans are provided by Heckman Homes directly. Their <br />engineers draw all of the foundation plans for her company. Mr. Engolia questioned if they <br />took the plans and put the footers in place. Ms. Boger replied conect. W. Engolia <br />questioned if then they came in and put the block up. Ms. Boger replied yes, after it was
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.