04/19/2001 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

2) Edward O'Ma11eX; 6037 Porter Rd. Pernut applied for: pool demolition & excavation of basement wall. Violation of section 1333.01 (j), and 1365.01. (Removal of demolished and building material.) Note: Prior to this proposal being placed on this agenda Clerk of Commissions, D. Rote hand delivered notices to the following people on 4/18/01. Mr. Labianca, Mrs. Weber, Mrs. Nash, Mr. Klatte, Mrs. Vanderhoof, Mr. Szule and Mr. O'Malley. Mr. & Mr. Kadras were not home and the notice was left at their front door. Each of the neighbors that were contacted voiced that they not only wanted Mr. O'Malley's request heard, but they wanted his request granted, as it was a mess and was nothing more then a breeding ground for mosquito's. Chairman Puzzitiello called all interested parties forward to review the request. As the applicant was not present at that time, the chairman announced that the board would come back to the proposal after addressing the next case. Mr. Puzzitiello suggested that the pool debris should be broken up and removed from the site. Mr. Klesta commented that as a contractor he is concerned that if a new owner wanted to add to the home as soon as they start to dig they would hit the pool debris. Mr. Engoglia indicated that the applicant should bust out the cement and remove it from the site. Mr. Puzzitiello questioned what the applicant was looking to remove. Mr. O'Malley questioned if he were to remove the entire patio from around the pool and remove all that debris from the site. He would then have the contractor break up the bottom of the pool and remove a 2foot by 2foot section to allow for drainage. He would then backfill in the hole. Mr. Klesta suggested that the pool bottom needed to be entirely broken up, then remove a 3foot section for drainage and at least 4 feet of the sidewalls would need to be broken up and removed. The patio around the pool should be broken up and removed from the site. If someone wanted to add an addition, the footer has to be at least 37inches. Mr. O'Malley suggested that he would put in a disclosure that the pool was just back filled and let the owner take responsibility. Mr. Conway commented that the board needed to uphold the code. Mr. O'Malley remarked that the contractor stated that the yard was not big enough to get the equipment to remove all the debris in the back yard. Mr. Puzzitiello remarked that if the applicant worked with the board by removing the top 3 feet of the walls and breaks up the bottom of the pool for drainage the board could grant his request. Mr. Klesta indicated that from top grade down 3 feet there can be no concrete. The patio is to be broken up and entirely removed from the property. Mr. Rymarczyk questioned if the board wanted only clean dirt used to back-fill the opening. Mr. Klesta indicated it would have to be clean fill dirt. Mr. O'Malley agreed to do what the board requested. R. Klesta motioned to allow Edward O'Malley of 6037 Porter Rd. the following approval; from grade to 42inches below grade and all concrete and debris must be removed from site. The bottom of the pool has to be busted-up for drainage. The back fill that is used has to be clean fill. This is in violation of section 1333.01 (j), and 1365.01. (Removal of demolished and building material.) If and when the applicant sales the home a disclosure must be written indicating what was done. The motion was seconded by R. Puzzitiello and unanimously approved. Motion Carried. 2