12/06/2001 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

.. G Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 section, 1135.02 D-4. The motion was seconded by T. Koberna and unanimously approved. Variance Granted Rob & Eva Hadzima; 6193 Paisley Dr• Request for variance (1123.12). The proposal consists of erecting a fence. The following variance is requested: 1) A 33 ft. variance for the fence to be within neighbors front setback (code pernuts 0, applicant shows 33 ft.). Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 section, 1135.02 F-2. Chairman Maloney called all interested parties forward to review their request. Mrs. Hadzima, the owner and Mr. Modenbach, a neighbor came forward to be sworn in and review the request. Mr. Maloney questioned how close the fence would be from the sidewalk. Mrs. Hadzima suggested that they would like to place the fence 3 feet past the existing trees so the roots do not become damaged. Mr. Modenbach questioned what type of fence would be erected. Mrs. Hadzima indicated that she wanted to have a 5-foot vinyl fence with lattice atop the fence. Mr. Modenbach requested to view the plans. Mrs. Hadzima indicated that they would be willing to place the fence inside the trees if they had too. Mr. Maloney indicated that the maximum height for a fence is 6-foot high. He believes that the applicant would like a 5-foot fence with 1-foot lattice on top. Mr. Modenbach believed that the fence would block in his home. Mr. Koberna indicated that he was concerned with what type of fence would be put in place. The code requires 50% open face. Mr. Rymarczyk reviewed what 50% open face would be. He reviewed why the variance was required for the board members. Mr. Maloney indicated that he would like to see the fence 5 feet high and 50% open. Mrs. Hadzima agreed to have the fence 5-foot high with 50% open face. No further comments were made. 7. Maloney motioned to grant Rob & Eva Hadzima of 6193 Paisley Drive their amended request for variance (1123.12). This consists of erecting a fence and the inclusion that the fence is no higher then 5 feet ta11 and 50% open face and that the following variance be granted. 1) A 33 ft. variance for the fence to be within neighbors front setback (code pernuts 0, applicant shows 33 ft.). Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 section, 1135.02 F-2. The motion was seconded by T. Koberna and unanimously approved. Variance Granted 6) James Kile; 4249 Clague Rd. Request for variance (1123.12). The proposal consists of building a shed. The following variances are requested: 1) A 93 squaxe foot variance for additional square footage of new shed (code permits 99 sq. ft., applicant shows 192 sq. ft. ), section (113 5.02 D-1). 2) A 14 foot variance to be within the required front 50 ft. setback of abutting lot (code permits 0, applicant shows 14 ft.), section (1135.02 D-5): Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 section, 1135.02 D-1 and 1135.02 D-5. Chairman Maloney called all interested parties forward to review their request. Mr. Kile the owner came forward to be sworn in and review his request. Mr. Kile suggested that his lot was long and he needed- space to store things as there is not enough room in his garage. No further comments were made. T. Koberna motioned to,grant 7ames Kile of 4249 Clague Road his request for variance (1123.12), which consists of building a shed and that the following variances be granted: 1) A 93 square foot variance for additional square footage of new shed (code permits 99 sq. ft, applicant shows 192 sq. ft. ), section (113 5.02 D-1). 2) A 14 foot variance to be within the required front 50 ft. setback of abutting lot (code permits 0, applicant shows 14 ft.), section (1135.02 D-5). ?