My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08/02/2001 Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Boards and Commissions
>
2001
>
2001 Board of Zoning Appeals
>
08/02/2001 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2019 12:48:36 PM
Creation date
1/28/2019 5:06:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
N Olmsted Boards & Commissions
Year
2001
Board Name
Board of Zoning Appeals
Document Name
Minutes
Date
8/2/2001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
? <br />talked to the engineering department and they've indicated that he woulci need to encase the sewer line in <br />6 inches of cement. For the pool to over lap onto the other parcel, he needs a variance from this <br />committee. He is in the process of gettin? those lots consolidated, but the surveyor said it would take <br />him six weeks before he can even get started. He was hoping that he could get permission that pending <br />sewer encasement to build on that second parcel. Mr. Maloney"questioned if the only variance he needs <br />right now is to built onto vacant line. Mr. Conway indicated that he also needs variances for crossing the <br />property lines, but he violates every property line setback imaginable, so instead of writing them all out <br />they just indicated that he is building right on the property line. He could write out seven or eight <br />variances, but just understand that he is crossing property lines. Mr. Gareau questioned what happens <br />with respect to the square foot area of coverage and the distance from the lot lines if the properties are <br />combined. Mr. Conway replied that if the properties are combined then they are wiped out. Mr. Gareau <br />questioned if the board conditions the variance upon the combination of the lots and gives you one year <br />to do it, are you going to be able to do it. Mr. Mills indicated that he was hoping to consolidate the two <br />lots this fall. He questioned if he would be able to encase the sewer line on that second parcel. Mr. <br />Conway indicated that anything that is at or below grade is not a structure. You would be protectinj the <br />sewers and sewers can cross property lines. Satisfy engineering and get this variance, you can put the <br />poo] up with one year to consolidate the lots. Mr. Sala questioned if he was over sized with the pool. <br />Mr. Mills replied no. Mr. Conway indicated that the old number was predicated on the much smaller Iot <br />and that's why the variance was so large. Once he combines the lots he will have a much bigger <br />backyard. Mr. Kremzar questioned if there was a reason that he was putting this pool over the sewer <br />line. Mr. Mills replied that if he moves it forward there are power lines and trees to the rear. Mr. Kelly <br />questioned if there would be a deck on this pool. Mr. Niills replied no. <br />J. Maloney motioned to grant David Mills of 3512 Dawn Dr. his request for variance (1123.12). Which <br />consists of a swirruning pool over two lots and that the following variance be granted: <br />1) A variance for an accessory structure (swimming pool) to be built on vacant land. (Code requires one <br />family dwelling on lot, applicant has lot without) Section 1135.01. <br />Note: 1. Setback for single lot being violated. 2. Lot consolidation would be required if variance is not <br />granted. 3. Applicant must encase storm sewer under pool area in concrete as per Engineering Dept. <br />standards. This will require a permit from the Engineering Dept., and inspection and approval this work <br />prior to pool permit being issued. <br />The motion was seconded by J. Konold and unanimously approved. Grantec! 8/3/01. <br />8. Ravmond Hufford; 5738 Revere Drive: <br />Request for variance (1123.12). The proposal consists of adding a deck. <br />The following variance is requested: <br />A special permit to add to a non-conforming building, section (1165.02). <br />1) A.22 foot variance for rear yard setback, {code requires 50 ft., applicant shows 28 ft.), section <br />(1135.08). <br />2) A 308 square foot variance for rear yard coverage, (code permits 280 sq. ft., applicant shows 588 sq. <br />ft.), section (1135.02 D-2). <br />Note: Coverage is based on existing rear yard area. <br />Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 sections, (1165.02), (1135.08) and (1135.02 D-2). <br />Chairman Maloney called all interested parties forward to review the request. The oath was administered <br />to Raymond Hufford, the owner, who came forward to review the request. Mr. Kremzar indicated that <br />there was no permit for the three-season room. Mr. Hufford indicated that the three-season room was <br />built before he owned the house. He has been there for about eighteen months. Mr. Maloney called for a <br />motion. <br />6
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.