08/02/2001 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

? 1) A 1 month variance for keeping a travel/camper trailer in the front yard while repairing it, (code permits a period not exceeding 72 hours in any consecutive 21 day period, applicant shows 3 months). The trailer is to be removed after the one-month is up. Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 section, 1135.02 H 3. The motion was seconded by J. Konold and unanimously approved. Granted (One 1Vlonth) 8/3/01. 6. GeorsZe Dalton5148 Porter Road: Request for variance (1123.12). The proposal consists of replacinc, existing garage with a new one. The following variance is requested: 1) A 130 square foot variance for size of new garage, (detached), (code permits 750 sq. ft., applicant shows 880 sq. ft.). Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 section, 1135.02 C-1. Chairman Maloney called all interested parties forward to review the request. The oath was administered to George Dalton, the owner, who came forward to review the request. Mr. Dalton indicated that he had bought the house a couple weeks ago from an older women who hadn't used the garage in a long time. The roof leaks, so it is in a state of disrepair. He plans on demolishing the old garage and building a new one in its place. He has some older cars and yard equipment so he was looking to put a 22 ft. x 40 ft. building in there. It would be 5 ft. off the property line and still 18 ft. away from the house. It is less than 20% of the backyard. The only variance he is requesting is to make it a little larger than the 25 ft. x 30 ft. allowed. The 22 ft. side will be facing the street, so it will look like a two-car garage. He talked to the neighbors and none of them have a problem with it. The new garage will have vinyl siding to match the house. Mr. Konold indicated that he is definitely improving the property there. He questioned if he would clean some of the trees out of tlle yard. Mr. Dalton replied that he would have to clear a few trees out. 1VIr. Maloney called for a motion. J. Konold motioned to grant George Dalton of 5148 Porter Rd. his request for variance (1123.12). Which consists of replacing existing garage with a new one and that the following variance be granted: 1) A 130 square foot variance for size of new garage, (detached), (code permits 750 sq. ft., applicant shows 880 sq. ft.). Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 section, 1135.02 C-l. The motion was seconded by W. Kremzar and unanimously approved. Granted 8/3/01. 7. David Mills; 3512 Dawn Drive: Request for variance (1123.12). The proposal consists of installing a 30 ft. diameter swimming pool over two lots owned by applicant. The followina variance is requested: 1) A variance for an accessory structure (swimming pool) to be built on vacant land. (Code requires one family dwelling on lot, applicant has lot without) Section 1135.01. Note: 1. Setback for single lot being violated. 2. Lot consolidation would be required if variance is not granted. 3. Applicant must encase storm sewer under pool area in concrete as per Engineering Dept. standards. This will require a permit from the Engineering Dept., and inspection and approval this work prior to pool permit being issued. Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 section, 1135.01. Chairman Maloney called all interested parties forward to review the request. The oath was administered to David Mills, the owner, and neighbors from 3520 Dawn Dr., Mr. and Mrs. Sala, came forward to review the request. Mr. 1Vlills indicated that the rear setback variance is no longer needed. They have two different parcels in their backyard and there is a sewer running underneath the smaller lot. He has 5