06/07/2001 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

hotel next door. Mr. Koberna commented that it would be a big improvement to the building. Mr. Conway indicated that the Building Department got a call from their attorney today about the signs, and they're about ready to send it over to the Prosecutor as nobody responded to them. It's his understanding that they intend to keep the one sian in front of the building and get rid of the smaller sign. Mr. Dixon replied yes, they would like to either put a new sign in that location, they are not sure if they are going to use the same foundation or not. T'hat was the first he was aware of this. Mr. Arellano suggested that he thought they needed to take the panels down. Mr. Conway replied that he would rather see the panels stay on instead of exposing the wires and tubing for safety purposes. So, put the panels back in and take the sign down or what he like to see is get something back to this board for a variance so he doesn't have to send this on to the Law Department for action. 50, if you can make you're mind up in the next couple weeks, we might be able to get you back here next month. Mr. Gareau questioned if they were going to replace the sign. Mr. Conway replied that's the problem, they are not sure yet. Mr. Gareau indicated that he would rather see the sign replaced. Mr. Arellano commented that they were planning on doing that and redesigning it, so they won't even be using the frame. Mr. Conway suggested just taking it down and getting the wiring out of it so somebody doesn't get hurt. Mr. Arellano replied O.K. Mr. Maloney called for a motion. T. Koberna motioned to grant El Rodeo Mexican Restaurant of 23135 Lorain Rd. their request for variance (1123.12). Which consists of adding to and revamping existing structure and the following variances be granted: 1) A special permit to add to a non-conforming building (1165.02). 2) A 71 ft. variance for front yard setback (code requires 75 ft., applicant shows 4 ft.), section (1139.07). 3) A 42 ft. variance for side yard setback (code requires 50 ft., applicant shows 8 ft.), section (1139.07). 4) A 12 car parking variance for number of car parking (code requires 84 spaces, applicant shows 72 spaces). N4TE: Item #4 above includes 12 car parking for the patio area, which is to be used seasonally. Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 section, 1165.02, and 1139.07. The motion was seconded by J. Konold and unanimously approved. Varianees Granted 6/7/01. 10. Wellington Place; 4800 Clague Rdo Request for variance (1123.12). The proposal consists of a mobile trailer sales office. The following variance is requested: 1} A special permit for temporary sales office. Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 section, 1123.06 A. Chairman Maloney called all interested parties forward to review the request. The oath was administered to Rick Meserini, Wellington Place Director, John O'Neill, Wellington Place Manager, Linn Nicola, a _ resident from 4832 Clague Rd., Scott Mingus, a resident from 4822 Clague Rd., and George Wasmar, a resident from 23347 Mastick Rd. Mr. Maloney indicated that they wanted to put up a sales trailer from May 7 through August 31, 2001. Mr. ONeill commented that the site plan shows the location of the sales trailer. It is located in the north west corner. Mr. Ivlaloney questioned if it was to be only a temporary trailer. Mr. O'Neill replied correct. The manager is in there to take care of people who stop by for information on Wellington Place. Mr. Wasmar questioned how long the trailer would be there. Mr. 0'Neill replied until August 31, 2001. Ms. Nicola questioned why the trailer would be allowed if it is violation of the ordinance and why do they have to sell out of a trailer and not in the building. Mr. O'Neill indicated that construction is not complete yet, and it might be unsafe to brino, people inside. When people decide to move into a residence like this, they plan it and it takes months to plan. Ms. Nicola commented that the sign in the windows is very unsightly. Mr. O'Neill indicated that they have 8